aerobic vs. anaerobic
Since I've read alot of you saying that the numbers on the machine are just a guideline, are there any kind of physical indicators that you are going into anaerobic mode? If anyone knows, I'd love to hear, so I can feel justified in ignoring that obnoxious machine.
During aerobic exercise - muscle cells use fatty acids and glucose to produce ATP as long as the cell is aerobic. Since we all know fat is 9 calories vs. the 4 in carbs and protein, aerobic production of ATP (energy) yields more ATP because fat is being metabolized. Byproducts of aerobic production are CO2 and water.
Anaerobic production of ATP relies heavily on glucose alone. Two anaerobic byproducts are lactic acid and heat. Lactic acid buildup can cause the 'burning' sensation and very quick fatigue. And absolutely true what saro said about panting, your muscles will want more oxygen so they signal the brain to breathe more, potentially causing hyperventilation.
Don't know if that helps or not - but keep in mind the 50-85% deal, watch for lactic acid buildup, getting overheated, and breathing too hard. :)
I always thought the harder I worked and the higher my heart rate was the better "fat burning" I was doing, but my heart rate monitor that tells how many cals I burn and the % of those that are fat I find its the opposite. At my age my max heart rate is 157 or 90% and when I get there and maintain that for any length of time my HRM says I burned 40% fat - but when I work out and stay in the low zone (105- 121) it tells me 60% of the cals burned were fat. So although I might burn more cals at a faster rate the % of those aren't as high in fat. Doesn't make much sense to me either.
If this is incorrect info, please let me know!
First you need to know your true Max Heart rate. THis can be hard to do if you are not a regular excersiser. Any time you are above about 85% max you are anerobic and this will burn huge quantities of glycogen.
breathing is one indidcator, if you are anerobic you will not be able to talk as you excersise and if you are anerobic you will tire very very quickly as you use up all the glycogen in your body.
this is generally not an area the average athelete works in as is manly used as a way to increase your time to exaushtion, as in sprinting.
I wouldn't trust those machines monitors buy yourself a good polar monitor instead
going really fast on the cardio machines doesn't always equal more fat loss. I always tell my clients slow and steady always wins the race.
you will not reach an anaerobic activity doing cardio, your body doesn't work like that.
Original Post by bmorcerf:
My trainer told me that the higher you get your heart rate, the more calories you burn and not to worry about anaerobic levels, you may be burning slightly less fat proportionately, but you are burning more calories overall. Of course, do not get uncomfortable. That is why intervals are good.
If this is incorrect info, please let me know!
If your working in the anerobic range, your not burning fat. Your usings energy systems called ATP (Adenosine triphospate), an CP (creatine phosphate). Creatine phosphate helps to make ATP. I wont go into that here but very basically your body uses uses this substance for energy. These substances is naturally created by the body but only in small amounts, hence we cannot perform at this intensity for very long. So when you perform at such intensity, your using ATP not fat. Please don't become intimidate with all the terminology. One rule to remember. The body only starts to break down fat, twenty minutes into your arobic exercise (which should be around 50-70 % Maximum Heart Rate). Twenty minutes is when the body begins to burn fat. So for it to be worth your while, if your looking to burn fat, i wouldn't train for less than half an hour. Though i would recomend 45 minutes three times a week. Unfortunuately 90 % of gym instructors don't know what there talking about. If you look at the course they take to be an instructor, it is frighteningly basic. Alot of them don't even know about the glycemic index. I hope this has been of some help. Any queastions. Give us a buzz.
I would also like to add, as i think its important. The fact that your being told, the higher your heart rate the more cals you burn. This is 100% inacurate. You burn cals by using the carbs in your body and of course fats. Carbs though are actually more responsible in most cases than fat for being over wieght because per gram, carbs have more cals than fat. Think about it, if you or i stuff are selves with carbs and fats, were going to get over weight cos were eating alot of cals. So how do we lose that weight. Obviously we burn what made us fat. We burn carbs and fat through aerobic exercise. Aerobic exercise increases the demand on the muscles for glycogen (carbs) which is broken down for exercise. Though if we do high intensity work, we use other energy systems which don't have high demand for glycogen (Carbs). In fact the demand is next to nothing. If your looking to lose weight, keep your workout reasonable comfortable, though its ok for the last five minutes to be uncomforable and difficult. Focus on low intensity such as biking or jogging and long times, long distances. Though if possible avoid swimming. Calorie burn wise its not worth your while. I can't give you the exact figures cos like everything else it depends on your wieght and swim style. As always, any questions let us know. regards John
Ehhh High intensity exercise = Anaerobic, which primarily relies on stored glycogen for fuel.
I do agree, but probably for different reasons, LSD as in Long Steady Distance is the key to loosing weight.
P.S. If you have the numbers please post them, always interested in more data.
UD
Original Post by john1824:
Though if possible avoid swimming. Calorie burn wise its not worth your while. I can't give you the exact figures cos like everything else it depends on your wieght and swim style. As always, any questions let us know. randy_john@hotmail.co.uk regards John
Then explain how Michael Phelps has to eat 8,000-10,000 calories per day to maintain his body weight?
Original Post by john1824:
Carbs though are actually more responsible in most cases than fat for being over wieght because per gram, carbs have more cals than fat.
Um, carbs are usually around 4 calories per gram and fats are more like 8 or 9 calories per gram. Last I checked 4 < 9.
And aerobic exercise has been shown to have the same effect as no exercise on fat loss (when the calorie deficit was held constant). High intensity exercise and weight lifting are much more effective in terms of weight loss.
I'm going to go out on a limb and cry troll (account set up yesterday, thread was raised from the dead so he had to search for the topic, and email address was provided).
If you need to push yourself to get your heartrate into the "fat burning range," go for it. If it means you are holding yourself back, don't bother.
^^ Yeah I think you are right, trolling or trying to advertise his service.
Which foods are high in both fat and calories?
Foods that are high in both healthy fat and calories are all nuts, nut butters, seeds such as sunflower seeds, oily fish (salmon, sardines... Read more

