sanguinepenguin

Posts by sanguinepenguin


User's Posts | User's Topics

Forum Topic Date Replies
Weight Loss Fear of not doing enough? Jul 04 2009
16:07 (UTC)

Brandon,

First of all, coming from someone who is already in the military, I think it's really unselfish and courageous of you to set this goal for yourself with the intent of serving our country. Good for you for even taking the first step towards this, it's more than most Americans can say they've ever done.

Secondly, don't give up! You want to lose a lot of weight and it's not going to be easy. But that doesn't mean that it's impossible. Make sure that you set realistic and small goals to meet so that you get positive reinforcement. Even just 2-5 lbs at a time will make you feel really good. Don't restrict yourself too much or tell yourself that you can't have something - you'll only want it more. But... keep track and when you think about wanting something, think about making a compromise.

Walking is great! Don't feel like you have to run. Once you have lost some more weight (which you will!) then maybe you can throw in 30 seconds or a minute of jogging. Work from there and don't go too fast. You have plenty of time, you want to make sure that you're keeping yourself healthy.

There is NO magic pill or diet out there. Only by eating well, within your caloric needs, and by exercising regularly will you lose weight. Just don't give up and always feel free to come back here for encouragement. The military will be lucky to have you!

 

Best wishes,

Mara

Weight Loss Society and Obesity May 04 2009
09:07 (UTC)
32

Hi! What a great topic to pick for a paper. As a reference, I'm reading a book Called "Food Matters" by Mark Bittman. He covers some of those topics and it might be useful to you. One thing about our world today is that for most of us, we have more food than we could possibly ever eat, which has led to a culture of over-consumption. And because we rely on the media to tell us what we need to be doing, how we need to act, and what our priorities should be, we are extremely vulnerable to advertising. A fave of mine are the pork commercials, that claim that pork is the "other white meat". Because we were told that poultry and fish are "white meats" and that they are "healthy", then when someone tells us that pork is a white meat (which it isn't, just when it's cooked it turns white, but it's red to start with, duh) all of a sudden pork sales go through the roof and we begin to think that pork is just another form of poultry or fish. Sorry, I just went off on a tangent. For me, or in my opinion, it all comes down to education, or the lack thereof. Sure, people are stressed out and time is money, right? But there are people out there (read: big industry) that are smarter than us and lot more savvy. They can spend billion of dollars just to get the average person to up their average beef consumption by even .5oz. That .5oz per person translates into even more billions of dollars in revenue for them.

So, I guess I sound like I'm a conspiracy theorist, which I suppose I could be. But all the pieces start coming together when you take a closer look at advertising and when you consider how much time the average american spends in front of a computer or TV. I live in Germany (I'm a soldier) and Germans are always out eating and they have some incredibly fatty foods and plenty of it, but they are really a pretty slim bunch. I don't know if that's because they tax you for owning a TV or if it's because they're good at moderation or if it's because they have 5 weeks of vacation every year, but you sure don't see fat people like we have in the States. Go into a French supermarket (like I did this last weekend) and everything is fresh, made with real butter, real milk, real sugar, no hydrogenated oils or high fructose corn syrup, and very little is available already prepared. But Germans and French have kids, and jobs, and stress. They manage somehow. Now, that's not to say that I'm losing weight like I want to. There are plenty of ways to pack it on here and the beer is just the beginning. But I blame it on the way Americans eat. We don't take enough time to enjoy our food because it's really not very good, and we always have someplace we HAVE to be. I can scarf down a pizza in, like, 4 minutes. OK, almost. But seriously... Europeans take FOREVER to eat, it seems, and I find myself becoming irritated when the waitress doesn't being my check soon enough. I'm trying to correct that, but it's tough overcoming a cultural norm.

For those of you who read this, please don't think that I'm anti-American.  I love my country and all the opportunities it gives. But for all our greatness, we have a tremendous amount of greed and the idea that "more is better" is firmly ingrained in our psyche. Next time you go to a grocery store, briefly imagine what would happen if you stayed out of the isles, and just stuck to the fringe of the market. What's on the outside? Produce, raw meat, cheese, milk, booze :-) Take a briefy foray into the isles to get some spices or indulge your baking wants and needs (like I do) and then hit the checkout. Is it impossible to imagine?

So I wandered off again, but I hope this gives you at least a spark of an idea for your paper. Good luck!

The Lounge just say a random comment. Apr 09 2009
14:07 (UTC)
1,130

Can you be profoundly profound? Or does it cancel out?

The Lounge just say a random comment. Apr 09 2009
14:03 (UTC)
1,132

Just reading these makes me forget about the delicious granola bars in my car. Damn, I just remembered.

Weight Loss Am I burning as many calories as the machine says I am? Mar 27 2009
07:51 (UTC)

That is interesting. I did go back to the site that I've been using (Brayden) and entered 165 for my weight. Sure enough, I "burned" about 100 or so more calories, even using the same information as before. That's not significantly off, but it does make me wonder. I've tried a few different sites in the past days and they're all over the place in terms of total calories burned. So I'm gonna stick with the lowest total and go from there. Better to underestimate than overestimate.

Weight Loss Am I burning as many calories as the machine says I am? Mar 25 2009
12:36 (UTC)
2

OK, here's what I found. On the Brayden website, for 3 hours and 14 minutes of running with an average HR of 155, it tells me I burned 1860 calories. I am 28 years old, I weigh 189 lbs, I'm female, and I don't know my VO2Max so entered zero in that field. On the triathlon website mentioned above, with the same stats, it tells me I burned 2866 calories. While I wish that were correct, but I think the Brayden one is closer to the truth.

Weight Loss Am I burning as many calories as the machine says I am? Mar 25 2009
12:24 (UTC)
3

http://www.braydenwm.com/calburn.htm

This is the site I use. Haven't tried the triathlon one; I'll check it out.

Weight Loss Am I burning as many calories as the machine says I am? Mar 24 2009
11:57 (UTC)
6

I've struggled with the same problem as a long distance runner. Most people and sources say that (while running or walking) you burn about 100 calories per mile. But sometimes I run very slow (if doing over 10 miles) and sometimes I try to run pretty fast, so needed to have something that was a little more accurate. My HR monitor doesn't have a calorie function, but it does give me my average HR over the duration of a workout, if I use the stopwatch function. I've recently started entering this information into a formula that just uses the average HR, total time, my age, weight, and sex, and then gives me calories burned. I've been losing weight as I have adjusted my caloric intake to match this, so I assume that it is reasonably accurate. For example, after running for 1:55 hours, with an average HR of about 156, I burned 1113 calories. This seems far more likely than the 2500 or so calories that I would "burn" on the treadmill. Just my take on it...Smile

Motivation Anyone have weightloss success eating over 1600 cals? Mar 18 2009
09:16 (UTC)
5

I just wanted to mention, too, that although it sounds like you are doing plenty of exercise and seem to be pretty knowledgeable, keep in mind that the "calories burned" function on the machines are rarely accurate, because they are based on averages. You could very well be burning far more, OR far less. I found this out the hard way as I started running more on the treadmill. At the end of a long (60 min) workout, I was happy with the almost 1400 calories it said I burned. Unfortunately, I wasn't losing any weight and couldn't figure out why. So I began wearing a heart rate monitor to get my average HR during exercise, then entering the number into a formula to find out how many calories I burned. This number was much lower, and much more realistic. I'm losing around 2-3 pounds a week now, because I have adjusted my calorie intake to my ACTUAL calorie output. For instance, I ran for 1:55hrs today, my average HR was 156, I burned 1113 calories. Hope this helps, and good luck! FYI, if you google "calories burned based on heart rate" it will bring up a post by someone here on this site, which will then give you the link to the formula.

Weight Loss What's Your Biggest Problem You're Having Losing Weight? Mar 09 2009
15:26 (UTC)
104

Biggest problem... all of them! I love carbs and justify (wrongly) eating them because I'm training for a marathon. Just FYI, running or training for a marathon will not make you skinny! I know! I also sit in front of a computer for 8-9 hours a day, which pretty much un-does all the exercise in the morning. And... I'm such a foodie that I have a hard time saying no to new and interesting foods and wines.

Fitness Marathon Training - How many calories do I need? Mar 02 2009
14:47 (UTC)
1

Hey -  Thanks for the reply. That's actually something that I hadn't considered, I'll give it shot for this week or next. I've been using my HRM and then entering my average HR into a formula that tells me how many calories I've been burning. I was surprised because it's far lower than what CC tells me I burn for the same about of time. For instance, CC estimated that I burned about 1100 calories for 1 hour and 20 minutes of sustained exercise at about 11.5 min. mile pace. This other formula took my avg. HR of 144 and estimated that it was only about 630 calories. I figure that's closer to the truth, so I'll stick with it for now. I'm running the Riga Marathon in Latvia. I'm stationed in Germany, so it's easy to get to and I have family there that I've never met. Good luck on your marathon!

Weight Loss How much fiber? Mar 01 2009
20:14 (UTC)
1

Just a note... if you're drinking caffeine free and sugar free  tea, then that could count towards your daily water intake. However, soda, juice, and milk, should not count, as they have far too much sugar. Water is meant to flush your body of toxins, and to replenish what we lose during the day. Juice and soda will not do this. Research is showing that while we don't need to drink the formerly recommended 8 glasses a day because food holds water, you should base your hydration level off of your urine color. Anything darker than pale yellow and you are dehydrated even if you don't feel like you are. Juice and milk are fine a few times a day because they have calcium and carbohydrates and plenty of needed vitamins, but make sure that you are taking in water, too.

Fitness Marathon Training - How many calories do I need? Mar 01 2009
11:17 (UTC)
4

Thanks for the reply. I actually have a Suunto HRM that I enjoy using, but unfortunately it doesn't have the calorie monitor on it. I hadn't been using it on my runs but I'm sure that I can find a way to convert my avg. HR over the length of the workout into some idea of calorie expenditure. I've just been finding it difficult to  adjust my intake vs. output because one day I'll run 11 miles, and the next I sit on my butt all day, or at least it feels that way. CC estimated that over nine miles of running I burned over 1100 calories, which is great, but I've been restricting myself to "make up" for the following day... if that makes any sense. My health and performance are the most important things with weight loss coming second, but it'd be nice to lose a few in the process :0) I'll look forward to hearing from Wes, as I'm a triathlete myself and could always use a few pointers.

Motivation Tall Ladies Unite Feb 26 2009
18:14 (UTC)

Hey Audrey - looks like we're the only ones on here for a while... let's get the party started again! I'm almost 6'1 and weight about 193. CC says I should weight 164.9 and I have to agree. I'm pretty athletic, I'm training for my first marathon and I've done some triathlons, but at 165 lbs I think I will be nice and lean and still strong. I def. don't want to be a stick figure, but it'd be nice to not be at the end of my size range... I'd love to fit into a size 8, or even a 10. I just started CC yesterday, so if you have any words of wisdom or motivation, feel free to share them! I'll do the same :-)

Join Calorie Count - it's easy and free!
CREATE FREE ACCOUNT
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recent Activity
sebastian999 added karbos33 as a friend
New forum message Binge/restrict cycle =(
by sweet_cheekz 07:14
sdellalibera added iwantthisoff as a friend