| Forum | Topic | Date | Replies |
| The Lounge | Unfaithful. | Nov 17 2008 20:12 (UTC) |
11 |
I'm sorry you are hurting and that your relationship ended. And regardless if you cheated or not, relationships hurt when they end. I'm in the "suck it up and move on" camp. Okay, so you'll grieve for a while and feel bad, but go out with your girlfriends and don't feel guilty if you find someone else for an evening. On the other topic of note: honesty is better. First, if you own up to your mistake, you have broached the subject yourself. The SO knows you made an error and can act or not on it as he or she chooses. What will hurt the SO more: finding out you cheated or finding out you cheated 6 months ago and lied to him or her about it? Chew on that for a moment. Second, especially if the infidelity was sexual in nature, your SO... your primary sexual partner DESERVES to know if he or she is at risk for any STDs. You have a responsibility to the person you ostensibly care about to let them know if you put him or hur at an increased risk for STDs. They're out there. Yes, there is protection that can decrease risk, BUT if you are in a relationship, your partner deserves to know what's been done with your naughty bits - preferably before he or she puts his or her naughty bits near yours. Honesty, trust, and communication are keys to good relationships. Spesh, you did right by confessing what happened, and you are facing the consequences of your actions. Honesty is important, and maybe you could think about reasons why you cheated before you get into another long-term relationship. Just a suggestion. I'm sorry you're hurting, and I hope you're back on your feet soon. |
|||
| The Lounge | I need some advice | Sep 23 2008 20:26 (UTC) |
3 |
If you are set with staying on campus, talk to Residence Life (or the equivalent thereof) and see if you can move. Often, spaces will open up at the semester break. Tell them your complaints, that you are not getting along well with your roommate, that your schedules are incompatible, and that you would like to move into a single (if possible) or if there would be a more compatible area of campus. Most Housing/Res Life departments worth their salt will try to place you in a different room and keep you on campus. They might have other alternatives. My sophomore year, I was able to transfer rooms between fall and spring semester, and I was much happier for it! |
|||
| The Lounge | Why I'm undecided as to for whom to vote. | Sep 19 2008 20:54 (UTC) |
65 |
Original Post by kathygator: I like that philosophy. I'm willing to take a risk on Obama because McCain seems more to me like he would be 4 more years of the same old crap that we're in now. And it seems more that way to me because he picked Palin as his running mate. |
|||
| The Lounge | Why I'm undecided as to for whom to vote. | Sep 19 2008 20:31 (UTC) |
74 |
It's just an interesting observation, that's all. Call it freakonomics if you want to. You seem to be gathering information. PS: I enjoyed the comment about you suggesting everyone make you king! :) |
|||
| The Lounge | Why I'm undecided as to for whom to vote. | Sep 19 2008 20:11 (UTC) |
77 |
Oddly enough, Democrats tend to be better at economic tasks important to Republicans. There are caveats mentioned in the article, and you can look at the numbers yourself. Of course, it won't say what Obama's policies are. It's just historical trends.
|
|||
| The Lounge | Why I'm undecided as to for whom to vote. | Sep 19 2008 19:15 (UTC) |
96 |
Original Post by ignayshus: Ig: Wow, a budget only 80 days late. New York State has a permanently divided government, and it barely functions. It has recently changed, but there was a point in time, not too long ago when the state had 18+ consecutive years of late budgets. Why? Because the Assembly is majority Democrat and the Senate is majority Republican, and the heads of the two houses agreed on absolutely nothing. It mattered not what party the Governor was: The folks setting the agenda could not agree on one, so NOTHING HAPPENED. It was not good for the people. There is some hope that this will change, but divided government when it becomes entrenched is not a good thing at all. Also: the President proposes budgets and sets the tone for policy. True, the President cannot create legislation, and any budget set has to be approved, but thankfully Congress changes hands far more easily than New York State legislative branches! Look what happened in the first midterm elections with Clinton. Here's something else to consider on your list of pros and cons for each candidate: The President has the power to appoint Supreme Court Justices. These are appointments for life. There are a couple of Justices who probably won't stay on the court for another 4 - 8 years. The President (subject to Senate approval) will appoint replacements. This can have some major ramifications on the interpretation of the Constitution - so reproductive rights issues will come into play as well. Just some food for thought. |
|||
| The Lounge | Relationships what we do wrong! The skills you need to make it work. | Sep 16 2008 16:32 (UTC) |
14 |
Original Post by safina1: In my current relationship, the Boy has expressed that he found me attractive no matter what my weight - that it is other things about me that make me attractive: my brain, my smile, the conversation, the spark between us, etc. He is supportive of my weight loss (and is losing some himself - I'm so proud!), but it doesn't really affect the relationship. I've put back on some weight from my first big downward climb from 250, and I'm physcially less flexible, which does have it's downsides. ;) I'm going to get tha back, though. He just doesn't want me to get so small that I'm unhealthy nor does he want me to get so small that he would be afraid of breaking me. On the other hand, I've been with someone who did not want me to lose the weight. He preferred me larger. I preferred me smaller. One of the (many) reasons that the relationship was not going anywhere on my part was that it felt like I hadn't lost any weight when I was with him. Off the topic of weightloss in relationships and back to an earlier poster about consideration: Yes, that is a definate must. I was a doormat once, and I will never be again. I'm someone who can give a lot of myself; fortunately, the Boy is also that sort of person, so there is a lot of consideration all the way around. And it feels effortless. It does not seem a hardship to think of him and do things to make him happy; it just happens. We have a lot of conversations that center around teeny little things that he has done for me or I for him and how it was something huge to the recipient of the consideration, yet seemed effortless to the one providing. |
|||
| The Lounge | Relationships what we do wrong! The skills you need to make it work. | Sep 15 2008 19:18 (UTC) |
24 |
At its center, this article seems to have the same advice that is at the heart of most advice about relationships: communication. You need to communicate and communicate well with your partner. That helps the conflict resolution, and knowing your partner, and the romance and sex, and almost everything else. I don't know if arranged marriages are better than ones children choose for themselves. I know I like having the choice to be in a relationship or not, although there is something to be said to take a step back and plan rather than rush in. Fairy tales teach girls that Prince Charming will come and swoop in, put a young lady on his horse, marry her and everything will be happy ever after - and that is not the reality. Dinsey relationships don't really exist. You have to be willing to put the effort in. It's not magically happily ever after. I don't know if I believe that there is "the one," but when you have opened yourself up to loving another person deeply, it sure feels that way (ask me how I know). :) I also believe that you can love more than one person in your life - which means that there can be more than one "the one." |
|||
| The Lounge | How to tell that the relationship is REALLY over | Sep 11 2008 21:17 (UTC) |
4 |
Zen, I have little to say that hasn't already been said. There are many times and ways you just know a relationship is over. A lot of it comes from how you feel when you're around the other person. If you're not happy around that person, or you feel like you're putting on an act, then the relationship is doomed. If you're looking of ways to end it, you should start with a conversation. Tell the other person that you're not feeling it the way you used to. You might discover some things that might make you reconsider, and if not, you have been honest to your future ex. Caloricat - The "It's nothing that you did or didn't do.. it's just me," is not always a line of bull. I dated someone who was a perfect gentleman, and he will undoubtedly make someone blissfully happy. He was the type of guy who would hold the chair for you, and give you random flowers, and buy you dinner, and all the wonderful things that women often say they want. And I can't say that all of that stuff was horrible. The problem was that I wasn't feeling for him all the mushy romantic stuff. He was good, he was nice, he did everything right. I just did not have an attraction for him. He didn't give me that "spark." I found myself resenting time I spent with him, and all these lovely gestures, because the spark wasn't there for me. So it really wasn't what he did or didn't do. It was all me. The compatibility wasn't there on my end. We're still good friends, but that's what it was supposed to be - friends only. |
|||
| The Lounge | for love or passion ? | Sep 05 2008 18:57 (UTC) |
7 |
Original Post by a_life_less_ordinary: And
Seem as though they wouldn't work very well. Are you going to close your eyes and think of England in order to have said chilren? What you seem to describe in the second quote is a very good friend. You need good friends in your life too. But even if someone makes an excellent "good friend" or "best friend" or "close friend," they won't always make a good boyfriend or husband. Because a boyfriend or husband is MORE than just a good friend. Because on top of all that stuff that makes a friend someone good to have in your life, there is passion and love and something beyond friendship. Physical attraction is a big part of that along with chemistry. And when you meet someone with all those qualities, you KNOW - in your gut and heart and mind. Yes, the initial burst of lust fades, but passion can still remain in a long-term relationship, so you don't need to sacrifice passion for love or love for passion. But by your own words, you don't seem to have either love OR passion in your relationship. I would suggest having a long talk with the boyfriend and put yourself out there. Any relationship will thrive on good communication and will wither and die without it. You seem to be building a very good friendship, and you should let him know your feelings. Small hurts now can save huge hurts later.
|
|||
| The Lounge | Cat Litter Advice! | Feb 27 2008 21:23 (UTC) |
1 |
"I don't use clumping litter at all; I use the Tidy Cats (or Fresh Step, whichever is on sale) crystals. They don't spread as far and my vacuum picks them up easier than the clumping litter. I used to use the Arm and Hammer and my floor was gross with litter. My cats jump over any pads I might put in front of the box (because they're jerks! lol!), " Odd, because I use Arm and Hammer for my 3, and they don't track it around the house, from either of their litter-box locations! No rugs or anything by the boxes either. Of course, they do most of their business outside, and will often go outside just to do their business before coming back in. Then again, cats can be picky about where the go and in what they go. If they're not happy about their litter situation, they'll let you know! Maybe they don't like the feel of the litter in their paws so they "fling" it out of the pan. Maybe they don't like the location, so they use it grudgingly. There are many reasons for litter tracking other than the brand. One of my kitties (all three are indoor-outdoor) had enforced indoor time because he had a vet appointment. Apparently, despite the litter-box, he held it all day so he could go outside. The vet tried to put a pan down, with litter, and he pawed it like he knew what it was for, but he would have none of it. He opted instead to go in the sink, directly down the drain! Smart kitty knows plumbing! The vet couldn't believe it, and had to feel his bladder to prove it was empty because he left not a drop in the sink! Cats are such moody wee beasties, so it might be a combination of things! |
|||
| Weight Loss | Is it okay to love food? | Feb 19 2008 19:49 (UTC) |
33 |
Some people find that thinking of food as fuel and fuel only lets them get into a headspace where they can control what they eat. This will not work for everyone. I have no problem loving food. Well, I also love food. I love tastes and sensations in my mouth. The trick is to savor the food and not wolf it down, so the yummy wonderful things about food that make you love it so much are highlighted, and have smaller portions. I think it can work, and you are not a horrible person for loving food. |
|||
| The Lounge | Curved Shower Bars - Obesity Accommodation? | Feb 05 2008 14:31 (UTC) |
24 |
| I always saw it as something along the lines that it was a way to make the bathroom/shower seem larger and hence more luxurious without them having to put in a large bathtub. | |||
| Motivation | Cool "Side Effects" of Weight Loss | Jan 23 2008 16:26 (UTC) |
16 |
This is really helping get my motivation back. :) Side effects that I noticed:
I've taken to shopping clearance sales. I got a new suit and sweater for under $40 thanks to the clearance rack!
|
|||
| The Lounge | why is there so much stigma surrounding sex? | Jan 22 2008 16:57 (UTC) |
38 |
I don't really have an answer about the stigma surroundig sex. The US has created a culture that simultaneously tells people SEX IS WRONG and SEX IS BAD while hypersexualizing children at a young age. And while there is a stigma attached to having sex, once you are 16 or 18 or definately 21, there is a stigma attached to being a virgin. Regarding the earlier comments about more committed relationships and how they don't decrease the chance of pregnancy, for example. At least in a committed or long term relationship, there is a greater chance that you are not alone in whatever happens. I also believe, as others do, that there are emotional consequences to sex that you might not be ready for. Not just the added intimacy for the person with whom you are having sex, but also the emotional consequences to the potential consequences of sex. Can you handle an STD? Can you handle an unplanned pregnancy? That being said, yes sex is fun, and more power to the people who can have a good time with strangers. Have your fun. I don't think we need to be trapped in Victorian social mores; however I also don't think that young teens, or indeed anyone, should feel pressured into having sex when they are not ready and exposing themselves to risk for which they are not ready just because "everyone is doing it" or they will lose their boyfriend/girlfriend if they do not put out. |
|||
| The Lounge | Gay Marriage | Oct 30 2007 15:35 (UTC) |
6 |
Okay, so I read through the thread and I know I'm coming in late, but why not add my few cents! 1) I don't think it was necessarily a religious right thing that got "Under God" and "In God We Trust" added in the 50's. It was more about differentiating the US from the "godless communists" in the USSR. It was all about labels during the "Red Scare," and the early Cold War, and if Congress was labeling the other side as "godless," then Congress figured it should emphasize that there is religion in the US... hence "One nation, under God." 2) I'm all for Gay Marriage. Marriage as the institution we know it started because of property rights waaaay back in the middle ages. It was all about amassing property for your family and making sure that the kid who inherited your property was yours. Frankly, I'm not here because my parents were married. I'm here because my parents got it on. They didn't have to be married for that. They were, but they didn't have to be. If you need to be married to produce offspring, why is there a teenage pregnancy issue? The only tie-in between marriage and reproduction is that the husband is assumed to be the father, and is the legal father, of any offspring in the marriage. The wife could be having fun with the postman, the garbage man, the cable guy, 3 of the guys on the block, and turning tricks in the evening, but the law assumes that the father is the husband. I think people who are committed to each other should be able to contract legally to share their property, insurance, inheritance rights, and tax burden, among other things. Marriage is the term for that contract. Religions really don't have a place in it. It's a contract. And if "Civil Union" is going to be the term for what it takes for homosexual people to be able to share all the benefits and drawbacks of married straight people, it is my belif that every couple, homo- or heterosexual should have to have a "Civil Union" in order to get the legal benefits. They can have a church marriage too, but it isn't the ceremony that makes a marriage legal... it's signing the paper at the end. Well, that's the "Civil Union" part. Just my two cents. |
|||
| The Lounge | Anybody dressing up for Halloween? | Oct 24 2007 14:30 (UTC) |
4 |
| I'll be going as the Venture Brother's Dr. Girlfriend. Apparently, I'm evil, and I like evil. :) | |||
| Motivation | Female 20's 50lb+ Group Motivation Club | Oct 16 2007 18:13 (UTC) |
136 |
hi girls! Sorry I missed last week! It's a crazy, crazy time. So anyway: Last week: 174 Yesterday: 174 Both are up from previous Mondays. But today, I'm 170, so yay! |
|||
| Weight Loss | Scale Rituals | Oct 12 2007 21:17 (UTC) |
23 |
While not as obsessive as Molly ;)... I weigh every day. I wake up, go to the bathroom, and eliminate as needed. Then, naked, I walk to my sewing room, where the scale is, and stays. The red line is lined up to a join in the hardwood floors. I turn on the overhead light, then a little spotlight focused on the scale dial (because if I didn't have the light, my shadow and the shadow of the line makes the scale difficult to read). I step on with my left foot and slowly transfer weight, utnil I step on with my right. I read the number and step off (right before left), and hope the scale will come back to zero. I repeat getting on and off the scale until the scale re-zeroes. Yes, the scale is old and persnicketey, but it's the one I started with, so with it I shall continue. |
|||
| The Lounge | ladies, im sure you know what i mean | Oct 12 2007 20:37 (UTC) |
2 |
Maybe it's coming from a perspective from being so overweight that I lost my period for many stretches at a time. I do a happy dance now that I'm regular. I feel the backache and the cramping and think "my body's doing what it's supposed to be doing!" I thank my body for being a good body when I get this monthly reminder of my fertility and womanhood. Then again, my symptoms also aren't terrible. They're nothing that can't be delt with, acknowledged and moved on. Yep, the weight goes up a little, I get the back ache, I get more cravings, a little more irritable, but then I step back and go "oh... yep, it's that time, okay." In my opinion, PMS, like college food, has been built up to be this huge horrible terrible thing, and that if you DON'T have cramps to the point where you have to stay in bed, or severe headaches, or severe bloating where you go up two sizes, or hysterical mood swings, then you're obviously not a real woman. I think that there's what women go through, and then the hype that then exaggerates everything, making it all seem worse, because hype tells us it must be so. I've seen TONS of commercials for BCPs that will magically soothe not only PMS, but also PMDD. So PMDD has now become disorder of the week. I do know that all women's bodies are different, and that everyone has different symptoms in varying severity, and that apparently on the scale of 1 to miserable, I'm rather low. It's a pain in the rear to have to deal with, don't get me wrong (when I was on the pill, I ended up with two a month, which is then twice the inconvenience, so the pill had to go), but I'd rather have periods and all the little irritations that go with it than not. Heck, some of them are lovely. Sure, the boobs get a little tender, but they also get a little fuller. The boy just loves that! :) |
|||
| Weight Loss | Obesity has been shown to be partially determined through genetics... so where's the hope? | Oct 12 2007 15:27 (UTC) |
1 |
The hope is in the fact that we are intelligent beings who can make choices for ourselves and make the most of the genes we were given. I could take the route that I'm "condemned" to be obese from both sides of my family. My father is obese, my mother is obese, my paternal grandmother was morbidly obese, my maternal grandmother is at least overweight, 2 of 3 maternal aunts struggle with their weight... I could sit back and blame it all on genes and be fat and blame it on everything but my own personal responsibility. OR I can do something about it. Of 5 granddaughters, I am the only overweight one. Of 8 grandchildren, I am only one of 3 who have ever been overweight/obese. One was my brother, and he lost 80 lbs and he looks great now and is a healthy weight. One is me. I've lost 80 lbs, have 20 more to go and look better than I ever had. How's that for genetics? Okay, so my genetics have determined that if I'm lazy and don't move around and eat junk, I will gain weight easily. They have also determined that I will lose weight slowly. That's what I'm stuck with. The hope is despite all that, I HAVE lost 80lbs. My brother did it too! He's kept it off for about 5 years now. My mom was skinny until she switched from a job where she was walking/running around all the time to one where she was more sedentary. It was her activity keeping her skinny. So her genetics say that she can reach a fat potential of obese, but because she was constantly moving around, she was burning and it was keeping that fat potential as only potential. So I've been at a plateau for a long time, barely losing any weight. I've been stuck in the 170s since March. It's been a battle, but I'm smarter than my food, and I can will myself to exercise and move around, and I WILL lose the remaining 20lbs and I WILL be a healthy weight because I'm smarter than my genes. I do NOT have to achieve my genetic obesity potential. And there is the hope. Just because the potential is there does not mean that you HAVE to achieve it! |
|||
| The Lounge | ladies, im sure you know what i mean | Oct 12 2007 14:48 (UTC) |
9 |
Wow, after reading all this, I feel rather blessed. I do get a little cranky and more whiney, but that's generally due to the low-grade low-back ache that won't go away and sensitive boobies. I get mild cramping just before it starts, and then just keep the low-grade low-back ache. There are pills that relieve the symptoms, and I've seen commercials for BCPs that claim to reduce severe PMS symptoms. I wonder, though if some of it is all in our heads. We're told from TV, from our mothers, from other women, that PMS is some horrible, horrible thing. You will, bloat, you will cramp, you will not feel like doing anything, so we convince ourselves we're bloaty and crampy and headachey and miserable (unless you take the magic PMS cure). On the other hand, everyone knows that all patients are middle-aged white men. Those are the only patients ever, and the people that medicines are designed for! |
|||
| The Lounge | Upcoming concerts you're excited about.. | Oct 11 2007 18:08 (UTC) |
38 |
I'm seeing Tori on Saturday with my best friend. It's gonna be fantastic! :-D |
|||
| The Lounge | So...Is Fat Really Bad For You? | Oct 11 2007 17:43 (UTC) |
1 |
Original Post by dnrothx: Free if you're over 70.... only valid on the black diamond trails. Back on topic, I read the article, and there are some good points that it brings up, which is similar to the points brought up in the Sugar-Busters diet book (yes, I did low-carb for a bit years ago!) which is that if you look at the portraits of European Royalty and chart when refined sugar hit the countries, the royalty tend toward obese soon after. I don't think fat is as horrible as it's made out to be. Even cooking light suggests using the low-fat versions to reduce calories instead of the no-fat versions of food because fat is a flavoring agent and no-fat tastes no-fat, whereas low-fat will still give the yummy mouth-feel that comes from fat. |
|||
| Weight Loss | "You're Getting Too Skinny!!!!" Sarcastic Comments | Oct 11 2007 14:40 (UTC) |
20 |
Everyone has mentioned the jealousy, and I agree. I'll be one of the first person to point out that every woman has her dark side where she's a total catty... well, not nice person. But since that's been said enough already, I want to add that even though it's jealousy, it might not be totally negative. It's probably commenting on you having achieved what they want. There's a woman I work with who keeps telling me I'm fading away to nothing! I'm not even at a "healthy" BMI yet! I'm still 80lbs lighter that I was, so comparatively, I'm skinny. My mom always calls me "skinny-minny" now. I know they're both a little jealous (they've said so), but they're also saying it in positive tones of voice or in my mom's case, the teasing tone of voice that we often use with each other, so it's both saying "dayum, you've done a fantastic job" and "dayum, I wish I could do what you did!" Congrats on the weightloss! |
|||
| Weight Loss | WOOOT! Reached my goal!!! | Oct 11 2007 14:29 (UTC) |
8 |
| That is utterly fantastic! Congrats! I wish you all the best in maintaining! :) | |||
| The Lounge | Tanned vs. Not tanned | Oct 10 2007 19:39 (UTC) |
2 |
Add me to the not-tanned column. I look horrible and unnatural with a tan. I do freckle. I like that I have pale-ish skin. My tone isn't porcelain, but it is light. I do not like the overly tanned look. I do not like the premature aging that comes from the overly tanned. I will go and get "color" which, if I judge my sun exposure just right, will make me a pale beige color - exceedingly far from tan. Of course, my genetics make it hard for me to "build a tan." Of course, I also tend to hold onto my "beige" for a long while. I don't find that being tan (or beige in my case) or not affects how I percieve myself as far as fat or thin goes. I do know that sunshine makes me happy and no sun makes me sad, but I don't feel thinner when that happens. I feel thinner when my pants are loose! :) |
|||
| The Lounge | So...Is Fat Really Bad For You? | Oct 10 2007 19:10 (UTC) |
6 |
Original Post by kathygator: If you want to further the conspiracy theory to the wild left wing, all this coincides directly with the embago on Cuba, since before then, we were getting cheap sugar from Cuba. :) ::beanie mysteriously fades back into the shadows:: ;) |
|||
| The Lounge | any clever poets out there? | Oct 04 2007 17:14 (UTC) |
12 |
Don't stress the holidays; be of good cheer Before you know it, they soon will be here You'll be sitting pretty in Santa's Chair With a gift from Impressions: a new do for your hair! To our valued customers, our thanks please remember With Ten Dollars off your next cut in December.
|
|||
| The Lounge | "Fat Is Ugly And Unhealthy" | Oct 04 2007 15:53 (UTC) |
13 |
| I'd just be worried about what an ad like that could do to the population on here that do have eating discorders, or are borderline. Something like that can unwork the good that some of them have found here and validate the unhealthy way of thinking. If fat is ugly and unhealthy, if I get to 0% body fat, I will be pretty and healthy. And 0% body fat is neither pretty nor healthy. | |||

So you can keep track of what you eat - which enables you to analyze your foods and receive the following:
- Health Score of your overall diet
- Warning when you approach your daily calorie limit
- Overview of the good and bad nutrients
