Posts by jenniferthepennifer

Thanks!  I heard from pg.. and maybe lorik will make a 7th account see this post too.

Original Post by alibsam:

haha don't try to act like the "bigger person" by leaving the thread. You blabbered on for 34 pages doing the exact same thing you harassed Lorik for doing.

However, I'm thrilled you're finally finished. 

Right!  

I'm glad she's done too - - trying to have a conversation with her was like getting a tooth pulled.

....octo - lol 

Edit** ((Hey! My post is 666! LOL Let's leave it here to freak people out))

Thanks alibsam -  I'm glad someone else gets what was being said.  

Original Post by fitnessgirll:

Original Post by jenniferthepennifer:

Original Post by fitnessgirll:

Ha.

I think youre really a bible belting conservative Christian. Just bc you stated you are not means nothing. Right?

Note: It's as valid as your point above about Obama. 

If I wanted to run for President of the United States because I felt I could do some real good in the world but I knew that being an Agnostic wouldn't get me in office because of the close minded bible thumping right - I would lie and say I was a Christian if it was for the greater good.  Again, not saying this is what Obama has done - I said it was a thought.  Please quit freaking out like I'm saying this is the God's honest truth.. it's a thought and opinion. I'm probably wrong. Forgive me oh brilliant one for sharing a THOUGHT. 

Valid as my point about Obama?  I didn't make a point - I shared a feeling. 

 Obama IS the president and despite him stating [numerous times] he is a ''devout Christian'', the 'bible thumping right certainly didn't vote for him.  I believe there is a poll out there to prove that one, too.

But, hey, if it makes you feel better to believe Obama's beliefs are more in line with your own..then so be it.  It's really rude to tell people their beliefs are crazy...dontcha think?

 

I think you need to take a breather, re-read what I said and come back. I think you're over-reacting.

I never liked watching porn with my boyfriend - it always made me feel like he was thinking of those girls instead of me.  

I don't have a problem with him watching it alone as long as it didn't interfere with our relationship (i.e. he's now masturbating so much that he has nothing left for me or he can't perform unless he watches porn first).  Other than that - I don't care.  I like it too sometimes!

Original Post by fitnessgirll:

Ha.

I think youre really a bible belting conservative Christian. Just bc you stated you are not means nothing. Right?

Note: It's as valid as your point above about Obama. 

If I wanted to run for President of the United States because I felt I could do some real good in the world but I knew that being an Agnostic wouldn't get me in office because of the close minded bible thumping right - I would lie and say I was a Christian if it was for the greater good.  Again, not saying this is what Obama has done - I said it was a thought.  Please quit freaking out like I'm saying this is the God's honest truth.. it's a thought and opinion. I'm probably wrong. Forgive me oh brilliant one for sharing a THOUGHT. 

Valid as my point about Obama?  I didn't make a point - I shared a feeling. 

Original Post by fitnessgirll:

Original Post by alibsam:

Not assuming any more than you are.

 Nope. I'm not assuming anything. I'm going on fact. Below is a quote from the President.

[To say he is not religious would be an assumption based soley on what you, or Lorik. et al, would like to believe. To say he is not religious would, indeed, be implying he is a LIAR.] 

"I am a Christian, and I am a devout Christian. I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. I believe that that faith gives me a path to be cleansed of sin and have eternal life. But most importantly, I believe in the example that Jesus set by feeding the hungry and healing the sick and always prioritizing the least of these over the powerful." (Barack Obama Christianity Today, January 2008)

I also am not assuming anything about the Kennedys. It is a known FACT that were VERY religous.  Would you like some of their quotes, as well?

I know he says he's a Christian I just have a feeling is a bit more liberal than MOST Christians and could possibly be Agnostic.. that, IMO, is a Good thing. 

Who brought up the Kennedys?  

Doh!  I just came back to delete this but I'm too late.. LOL - - I thought you said you were Pentecostal... Ok - starting over.

1. God and Jesus are the same.  So God punishes himself to appease himself for a crime that humanity committed (which he already knew they were going to do). How does this make sense?

2.  You believe he died for our sins but you don't believe we are born sinners?

3.  You believe you must accept Christ as Lord because it was written in the Bible correct?  Even though you know the book is not the book of God - because how can a book be holy when it's been passed around, added to, and nit picked to suite so many different beliefs?

4. Same as number 3...  You say the Bible is man made and has evolved over time. Has the evolution stopped and that's why you believe what's left (i.e .the stories, etc?) is the true word.  God's final answer if you will?      Or do you think it will continue to evolve?  If so - why were the other 300 books dismissed?

5. I said actual place.  I thought you said you didn't believe in an actual location for heaven and hell?  I'll have to look back at your posts.  Still.. it's pretty amazing to me that someone like Jeffery Dahmer (sp) the serial killer.. can accept the lord in prison and be saved and go to heaven and  yet someone like me who is honest, hard working, does good deeds, doesn't hurt people, caretaker to my family, good mom - -- I will go to hell for not believing...

6. HOw can you believe we are not born sinners if you believe the Bible to be true? It says it right there.. that's the whole reason Jesus died on the cross - which you believe in right?

7. Sorry about the UPC thing.. LOL  - oops

I have a LOT more questions but this is good for now. 

Edit* Meant to delete the bottom thing but I think I'll keep it.  :)  In case you're wondering why I had a random statement at the bottom..  :/

. God tells Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree of knowledge or they will die.  Well they eat and don't die.  Doesn't that make God a liar? How do they even know what 'to die' means? Not very fair of God. How do they even know what 'wrong' is if it takes eating from the tree of knowledge to be right or wrong?

Original Post by fitnessgirll:

Original Post by loriklorik:

I don't believe what I "want to believe" (it would be a lot more fun to believe in star wars universe...i wub wookies)....I believe the only possible thing to believe (and that is simply understanding the answer "could" be anything, but no reason to believe in any one thing randomly).

So, since you said, and I will quote..."the answer could be anything''...meaning...Simwaves could be right! IN YOUR OPINION, you could be wrong!

[IMO, you ARE wrong..but what the hell do  I know].

I think you both have given awesome arguments...Simwaves more on actual FACT. ...You on more of REACHING to explain/argue your stance. ..Either way, both are relative...just only ONE hits home [and I believe this is true with the MAJORITY of the people that have read this thread[ not just the 10's of 20's that have PM'ed me]. Lorik, I respectfully have to say...

YOU MAKE NO SENSE. EXCEPT that you seem to make an HUGE amount of SENSE to YOURSELF since you respond to questions as if it is all obvious! HA.

I thank Simwaves for EXPLAINING his answers and not just BLURTING them out and BELITTLING others..

Lorik, may the force be with you.

You're the only one who likes to belittle people fitness girl.

I seriously doubt that the majority of folks reading this agree with Simms. In fact, I doubt they even know what the hell he's talking about - including you. Like Lorik said, he's a lot of smoke and mirrors.  He likes to say big fancy words and quote from books to prove he's right.  Well, he can't prove he's right... and that's all Lorik is trying to say.

You said anyone reading this post would agree that simms has the advantage. Hmm, don't think so.  

Lorik doesn't beat around the bush - he's straight forward and he pushes back with legitimate arguments (If that's what you call this). I'm impressed.   

Original Post by foffles:

Original Post by jenniferthepennifer:

Ouch, I just pictured a robot OBG-YN...  No way in hell I'd allow that!  ha

 Ugh... as long as it didn't have cold fingers...

 What if it went too far and punctured something... or worse, what if it... LINGERED! 

Edit to say I think puncturing would be worse than lingering.. not sure why I said it like that.. had a Hermoine moment.

Original Post by kimothyschma:

I'm a graphic designer. I think maybe they could program a robot with knowledge of colors that go together, visual composition, and I think it could fill templates or something, or generate generic corporate logos. But I don't think it could bring the creativity that makes design really great. I think we will always need humans for the creative fields.

 Yeah - creative jobs would still be around..

Ouch, I just pictured a robot OBG-YN...  No way in hell I'd allow that!  ha

Original Post by foffles:

If robots could do my job... well, we'd be screwed. I write computer programs... that could get scary fast of they could program themselves to do... anything.

As far as robots doing other jobs, I guess it'd be nice to eliminate human error in jobs where precision is important (ie surgeons, etc), but we already have alot of people without jobs. I also see that taking a terrible toll on the earth, concidering we'd have an army of 'people' available that could work 24/7 and do physically demanding tasks with much more ease than humans...

 Ooohhh, that would be scary if they could write their own programs!

It could eliminate human error and also people having to tip for so many services.. but, what would WE do?  All the folks out of work?  That reminds me of Wall-E - -anyone see that Disney movie?  We'll all be fat, sitting in recliners with virtual helmets on *thinking* we are living our lives.

Someone sent me this - so I thought I'd share..

Point 1.

As things stand now, the vast majority of children who develop flu-like symptoms this fall will have a few miserable days, and nothing more. And those days are best spent at home -- not in the ER or a doctor's office.

Point 2.

If you are worried, you should call your pediatrician's office first. Don't take your child in without calling. Two reasons: Your child may not have H1N1, but could become exposed by being around sick children. And, after several hours of waiting, you are still likely to be told the basics -- plenty of fluids, rest and dose-appropriate acetaminophen for a fever. After all, it is still the flu we are talking about.

Point 3.

One doctor told me a way to think about things that was helpful. He said "remove the term H1N1 from the equation." If your child had regular flu, would you take him to the hospital? If the answer is no, then don't take him/her to the hospital now.

Point 4.

Yes, hearing between 30,000 and 90,000 could die from H1N1 is scary, but keep in mind -- around 40,000 people die from the regular or seasonal flu every year. The numbers may not be that much different, yet there is not panic about the regular flu. As things look now, H1N1 is causing only mild to moderate illness, not the widespread deaths people are worried about.

Point 5.

There are some children who should be seen by their doctor. Call your doctor if:

• A baby younger than 12 weeks has a fever greater than 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit

• A child, older than 12 weeks has a fever for three days

• A child's fever returns after a 12-24 hour time period

• A child is not passing urine or making tears for more than six hourshttp://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/library/swine-flu/D S01144.html_

• A child does not smile or show interest in playing for several hours

 http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/09/01/parents. h1n1.flu.guide.gupta/index.html

Original Post by watergirl:

Original Post by jenniferthepennifer:

Besides Watergirl's avatar.. I'd have to say this DOG!

 

J to the P, that robot rox!

 Did you see at :42 and 1:31 - - that thing doesn't fall down.. and the sound it makes and the spindly legs.. it's like a giant bug!   Creepy!!!   ha

Besides Watergirl's avatar.. I'd have to say this DOG!