 |
 |
 |
 |
| Weight Loss |
Anyone tried The Warrior Diet? |
Nov 03 2009 18:26 (UTC) |
11 |
Original Post by vicdiann:
I havn't ever heard of this diet, but boy did you get some NASTY responses... Good luck if you try it though.
Lol, yeah I noticed. People are always skeptical of radical ideas and probably rightly so.
Most people who scorn the Warrior Diet do not really understand the principles or make gross assumptions about what you eat. I've had multiple posts that explain it all, so hopefully people who are truly interested in it and are open minded will read those. You can't force people to read though. :)
The issue of metabolism is addressed by Ori although the science behind it may be a bit lacking. Most people who try the WD feel great throughout the day, myself included. I do not miss the constant ups and downs of meals and I am more than happy to snack on vegetables, some fruits, maybe nuts or a little bit of cheese if I want it.
If you follow the plan, you do not simply eat twelve pizzas and ten cheeseburgers at night. Anyone who has not eaten during the day and then gorged on processed junk food have not been following the Warrior Diet principles at all. Most meals at night start with a large, healthy salad with a nice variety of fresh vegetables. You then move on to lean proteins along with cooked vegetables, and then you decide one of three options if you are still hungry: carbs (organic brown rice, baked potatos, beans, etc) OR fats (nuts and cheeses primarily) OR alcohol, being careful not to mix the last three options in one meal. You eat until you are satisfied and do not count carbs or calories.
Since you are not eating processed junk foods, fried foods, potato chips, french fries, etc, it would be difficult to gain weight if following it properly. You do eat until you are satiated which is a nice feeling. No guilt. If you are still hungry in your four-hour window, eat some more but keep it healthy.
A lot of people try the Warrior Diet, feel great, follow it for a few weeks and then are not heard from again. Maybe they still follow it or maybe they dont; any diet likely has the same result. I've seen posts on Warrior Diet's forums and on DragonDoor's forums from people who have followed it long term and they seem happy. But honestly those testimonials are not plentiful. I think the Warrior Diet still has a niche market. :) |
| Weight Loss |
Anyone tried The Warrior Diet? |
Nov 02 2009 22:01 (UTC) |
17 |
Good points about the Warrior Diet as far as the products go. I've used some of the products just because they were on sale at the time. They are useful but by no means are a required part of the diet.
I guess its kind of rare to see anyone on a diet long term, but it is kind of odd that most testimonials about the Warrior Diet (including my own) are from people have been on it less than a month. DragonDoor's forums have some longer term Warrior Diet members but in general most people are like "its great! I'm on day two.."
I've been doing the Warrior Diet off and on since July of last year. It's not a hard diet to follow, but usually I am less disciplined at night when overeating where I do not eat the right foods. I get the nagging feeling that if only I really followed the principles I would do great.. but then it's easier said than done I suppose.
I'm giving it another shot, although I am also looking at Reshape The Nation's plan when they finally get it going. Their plan is eating every three hours like clockwork and is obviously quite different than Warrior Diet. They do make some excellent points on nurtition, though. There's no one right way to eat, and its good to experiment to see what works for you. :) |
| The Lounge |
Do you believe in second chances? |
Aug 17 2009 15:47 (UTC) |
22 |
I like the idea of Vick being back in the NFL just to serve as a constant reminder that NFL players are not some gods to be revered. They are just people. People with excellent ability at sports.
So let Vick go back and play a game he is good at. A lot of fans want to see him play football. A lot will want to see him fall flat on his face. Eagle fans will want him to win the superbowl.
However any time Vick's name is ever mentioned, the dogfighting / jail time is always going to come into the conversation at some point. Hopefully that will be a little bit of a reality check to the 'hero' status people place on football players in general. Some truly are respectable and admirable. Most are just people with very different lives off of the field.
|
| The Lounge |
i was thinking about faith this morning... |
Aug 14 2009 15:49 (UTC) |
8 |
I didn't have any problems about not being alive before I was born, so I doubt I will have any problems about not being alive after I die. :) |
| The Lounge |
Jesus Camp? |
Aug 13 2009 17:42 (UTC) |
18 |
Original Post by pgeorgian:
not true. most smart atheists agree that jesus probably existed; he just wasn't the son of god, because god doesn't exist. and he wasn't born on dec. 25 (we all know this, right?), in the year zero, and he wasn't resurrected, and he didn't perform miracles.
but he was probably a perfectly decent guy, and he probably had lots of admirers.
Actually there were a lot of Jesus' around that time. Remember several years ago when there was a question of whether or not they had found the tomb of jesus? The point was that Jesus was a very common name at that time.
So sure, there were jesuses. There are jesuses today. Whether or not there was one particular Jesus who did all the things in the bible is highly debatable. The most obvious answer is that it was all made up, hundreds of years after the events were supposed to have taken place. |
| The Lounge |
Jesus Camp? |
Aug 13 2009 14:15 (UTC) |
25 |
One cannot reasonably deny the effect of religious indoctrination upon children in regards to their religious beliefs. Religions invariably stress teaching children and any others who will listen about what they believe. In many ways, religion is strikingly similar to a pyramid scheme.
Take a look at a map of the globe in regards to religious belief. It really isn't that hard to see that people who are taught a religion since birth grow up wholeheartedly believing that religion. They casually dismiss all other religions and simply believe theirs is the 'one true' religion. Even people of the same religion divide it up further into different sects and believe their sect is the one true sect and everyone else is sadly mistaken.
Those of us without religion really can't help but to shake our heads when people try to convince us that it wasn't their upbringing that lead to their current beliefs. Or that they have the capability to separate their upbringing and examine their beliefs logically.
I am happy for people who embrace their religion if thats what they need in life. If they feel it makes them better or more moral or whatever, that's great. The only thing we ask is to limit your belief to yourself and to not force that belief upon others.
'Jesus Camp' is a bit extreme, however that doesn't exonerate other forms of indoctrination that are more subtle yet just as effective. |
| The Lounge |
"Lose 18Lbs in 4 Days!" |
Aug 10 2009 13:20 (UTC) |
1 |
Indeed! How much weight you lose is up to you. If you want to lose the most weight, we recommend amputating both legs instead of just one! :) |
| Fitness |
Kettlebells |
Aug 07 2009 20:46 (UTC) |
1 |
Original Post by littlesimongeorge:
It's all good bro!
Keep up the good work!
Are you doing cleans and snatches with your kettlebells?
Yeah, each class puts up usually between 8 and 10 different exercises that we run through 30 seconds on, 15 seconds off. Sometimes its varied (40 sec on, 60 sec on, etc). We usually run through the exercises in three sets.
Lots of swings, double cleans, snatches, presses, squats, lunges, rows and usually some ab exercises such as russian twists, planks, bicycle kicks, V-ups, deck squats.. as well as some pushups or pullups. Each class is really varied which is why we are so lucky to have them here in so cal. :) |
| The Lounge |
How would you react? |
Aug 07 2009 13:32 (UTC) |
76 |
Our imginations tend to get the best of us when we think of all the various scenarios on why something like that may have occurred. If it bothers you (and I dont blame you that it does), I'd call your parents and your brother and ask why they went to the park without you or didn't even ask. They might come up with something like 'oh we knew you were working' or 'your ex asked us not to invite you' or something similar. That might not make it better but at least you'd know what the reasoning is instead of having to guess. You can also let them know that you didn't appreciate it and in the future they should at least let you know what they are up to. It's not too much to ask.
I hope things improve for you and its good that you get to still see your kids regularly. Good luck :) |
| Fitness |
Kettlebells |
Aug 07 2009 13:20 (UTC) |
3 |
Original Post by littlesimongeorge:
Sorry mate, but I think that's absolute nonsense. That's exactly the kind of comment that makes me roll my eyes when I read kettlebell ads and makes them sound like a fad.
Well in my defense I stole that block of commentary from the previous post on kettlebells, and agree the last paragraph is a little over the top.
Being this is a weight loss site more than a powerlifting site, for me the best thing about kettlebells is the calories burned, the structure of going all out for 30, 40, or 60 seconds and then resting for 15 or 20 seconds. Given that I am at a calorie deficit each day, its very difficult to actually gain muscle. I am definitely getting stronger over the year or so I've been exercising with kettlebells, but I can honestly say the workout for me is about 100 times more effective then when I was at the gym walking on a treadmill and then doing weightlifting exercises here and there. I'm fortunate to have a local gym with an instructor that sets the routine, mixes things up and keeps track of the time to make sure we stick to the 30 seconds on, 15 seconds off, etc. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be able to do that on my own. :)
|
| Young Calorie Counters |
do i have a right? |
Aug 07 2009 02:56 (UTC) |
1 |
It's never too late (or too early) to adopt a healthy eating plan. Focus on eating a lot of fruits and vegetables, stay away from processed foods as much as you can. Try to be active and I am sure within a short period of time you will be back to wherever you were previously and feel a lot better for it. |
| Fitness |
Kettlebells |
Aug 05 2009 13:37 (UTC) |
11 |
Original Post by amethystgirl:
But if I came on the forums and said "You can do the same things, but kettlebells barbells give you a different work out [than dumbbells]. A better one," people would laugh at me. Not at the "different" part, but because I claimed that it was "better." Define "better."
I think lsg had it right - kettlebells are just tools, like dumbbells and barbells. Always good to mix it up, and do different things, but at the end of the day, kettlebells are just weights with a fancy handle (which, yes, allows you to swing them). Not better. Just different.
I'm assuming that one, you've never tried using kettlebells. And two, you did not read through the other thread which explained the difference between dumbell/barbells and kettlebells. There's nothing wrong with that, but it would explain why your statements are not accurate.
I'll copy a very good explanation from the other thread below that will hopefully explain the differences between kettlebells and dumbells. Each tool has its intended use, and the results are definitely not equal.
--
A Quick Lesson in Biomechanics There are as many as 640 skeletal muscles in the human body that are recruited for locomotion. Of these muscles 63 percent are Stabilizers, Decelerators and Synergists. Otherwise known as balance and stabilizer muscles.
When it comes to traditional weight lifting such as with a dumbbell these balance and stabilizer muscles are not utilized very effectively. Traditional weights work in just one plane of motion and rely on leverage and static fixed positions. While in normal life our bodies move in three planes of motion. They are the Sagittal Plane, the Frontal Plane and the Transverse Plane.
To give you a clear idea of what this all means consider that 90% of all traditional weight lifting such as with dumbbells is a Sagittal Plane movement only. Now consider that 70 percent of all injuries occur in the Transverse Plane. A plane of movement that traditional lifting does not target.
When you lift a dumbbell the handle is directly in line with the wrist, which is the first point of axis. In other words there is a direct line of what is called “Applied Force.” This is because the dumbbell is symmetrical as a result of its balanced grip.
A kettlebell on the other hand is highly unstable and unbalanced because its design is asymmetrical. There is no direct line of applied force. The moment you pick up a kettlebell it triggers instability, which engages all 38-core muscles. When used correctly Kettlebells also engage all four major body systems - Nervous, Cardiovascular, Muscular and Skeletal.
Working correctly with a kettlebell is the simultaneous equivalent of a jogging or sprinting heart rate (cardiovascular), fast ballistic multi-tasking movement (nervous system), fast ballistic movement (muscular), and extreme deceleration forces (skeletal) all at once! Apparently this is called Metabolic Conditioning.
Why the Confusion Between Kettlebells and Dumbells In the professional opinion of one person who I was reading the confusion on the subject of kettlebells vs. dumbbells comes from a lack of proper instruction regarding how to practice with kettlebells. As a direct result many people make the critical mistake of attempting to use kettlebells as if they were traditional weights.
Traditional weight lifting is what is single-plane static. This refers to how your body is in a fixed position while moving weight towards and away from you in a linear manner through a direct line of applied force. All the while attempting not to use any momentum and targeting an isolated muscle or muscle group.
What’s more traditional weight lifting builds muscles differently. Generally speaking the goal of bodybuilding is muscle hypertrophy meaning an increase in muscle size. Unfortunately most people associate size with strength. What most people do not know is that 50-70-percent of hypertrophy size is from fluid called Sarcoplasm. Sarcoplasmic Volume accounts for 50-70 percent of muscle gain/size incurred through traditional weight lifting. It is a fluid and not muscle fiber, which means it contributes very little to direct strength.
Kettlebell training is the antithesis of traditional weight lifting. Working with kettlebells is to use all three planes of motion simultaneously. The Transverse Plane is heavily targeted. You will remember that this is where 70 percent of all injuries occur. Kettlebell training is based upon generating momentum and then perpetuating, redirecting and decelerating that momentum.
Almost every kettlebell exercise engages literally hundreds of muscles at once. Most expert level kettlebell lifters have profound functional strength without bulky size. This is because the very nature of kettlebell training triggers greater Myofibril density. Myofibrils are contractile organisms within the muscle that are directly related to strength
So kettlebells produce muscle that is incredibly dense and strong without bulky size. Even if you were to attempt basic kettlebell movements such as a kettlebell swing with a dumbbell it still does not even come close. However you may attempt to hold the dumbbell there is still a direct line of applied force and the dumbbell itself is still balanced in design.
The Bottom Line A kettlebell lifter can do whatever a traditional weightlifter can do. On the other hand the traditional weightlifter cannot do what a Kettlebell user can do. In addition the Kettlebell user has real world strength that applies to real world situations, everyday tasks and obstacles. |
| Fitness |
Kettlebells |
Aug 04 2009 13:44 (UTC) |
20 |
Original Post by littlesimongeorge:
Something I will add is that Kettlebells are just tools, like dumbells and barbells are.
Exactly. They are not mutually exclusive where you have to use just one or just the other. Why use dumbells for kettlebell type exercises, though, when you could use a kettlebell? Sure you probably could go through the same motions, but thats not really the intent of dumbells and you wouldn't get the full benefit.
You could eat soup with a fork. Just because you can, though, doesn't mean its smart. :)
|
| Fitness |
Kettlebells |
Aug 03 2009 20:42 (UTC) |
23 |
Here's a good thread about kettlebells, the differences between dumbells, people's experiences / preferences, etc:
Anyone here use or have used Kettlebells? http://caloriecount.about.com/anyone-use-used -kettlebells-ft136544-1
I still work out four to five days a week with kettlebells at a local gym that offers daily kettlebell classes. My goal right now is fitness and weightloss, though, so I am not in it for bodybuilding. My strength and endurance have definitely increased and I enjoy the kettlebell classes much more than I did going to the gym. That's just me though. :) |
| Foods |
pumpkin seed addiction |
Jul 30 2009 17:58 (UTC) |
|
Lol, that is strange. I bought a pack from the store and only eat a little bit at a time. Its salty but its better than some other things I could be eating.
For you, I'd recommend going to a health foods store and buying organic pumpkin seeds that are not roasted and salted... or even if they are, they are bound to be better than what is packaged in the Davids seeds. I bought organic pumpkin seeds and they were good.. I dont remember if they had them without salt or not.
Good luck to you :) |
| Young Calorie Counters |
Any teenage boys losing weight for vanity? |
Jul 27 2009 13:26 (UTC) |
12 |
Just a heads up.. if you are worried about 'man boobs' you might be barking up the wrong tree. Its good to lose weight, however be aware there is a condition called gynecomastia in which males develop breast tissue usually around the age of 13. It's a far more common condition than you might think. The problem is that the tissue that develops is not always fat; those that have this condition (including me) almost always have to have the tissue removed by surgery at some point. Doctors recommend losing weight first before having surgery, however losing weight alone will not cure the condition for most people.
A lot of guys didn't even know there was such a thing as gynecomastia until years and years go by. My advice to you would be to see a doctor who will be able to tell you if it is pseudo-gynecomastia (fat instead of breast tissue) or gynecomastia. It may save you years of frustration and embarassment that many have gone through before deciding to do something about it.
Check out http://gynecomastia.org for more information; they have a forums section there thats pretty good as well. Good luck and I hope for your sake its just weight that can be lost. :) |
| Weight Loss |
Has anyone reached their goal weight and then realized that they're not as thin as they thought they'd be!? |
Jul 24 2009 17:56 (UTC) |
|
Being very overweight covers up a lot of the muscle, body shape, etc. Its not too surprising to get to a certain number and then not have the body you would think goes with that number. The last few pounds are always hardest to lose, and when you are right at your goal your focus changes from losing losing losing to more about toning, losing a bit here and there, and finding the right comfortable weight for yourself as well as trying to find a look you are happy with.
The hardest part (lots of weight loss) seems like its over.. now its just the nuances to fret over. :) Good luck! |
| Weight Loss |
Article: Why calorie counting makes you fat |
Jul 22 2009 15:41 (UTC) |
3 |
I've always considered calorie counting as a learning tool. I doubt that I will be calorie counting my entire life, however at the beginning of my efforts to lose weight it has been crucial.
A lot of us would agree that when we eat 'whatever we want', most of the time are not looking at the nutritional information of the food. We know its 'bad' but do not look to see exactly how bad it is. Once I decided to count calories, I paid a lot of attention to the nutritional label and content of food. It's quite an eye-opening experience to say the least.
After calorie counting for a while, I can get a pretty good idea of a food has a lot of calories or not, and a pretty good estimate of what it has. Rather than micro managing to an exact amount each day, I can eyeball the foods I've eaten to come up with an estimate that is fairly close to what I'd target in a day.
Furthermore, upon examining foods it becomes obvious that the unprocessed, whole foods are better for me. Vegetables are low calorie and nutrient dense. So migrating to eating whole foods, preferably organic foods is somewhat natural.
Counting calories certainly has its uses, however I am not obsessing over every single calorie just as I do not obsess over every single weigh in. For those just starting out, calorie counting is a very useful tool. For the 'pro' that has been at it for a while, its almost second nature.
Thanks for posting the article. :) |
| Weight Loss |
need to help my brother.. advice please :) |
Jul 22 2009 15:28 (UTC) |
7 |
It's difficult to say what would work. I think education about diets, the effects of foods, etc would be a very good place to start. There are tons of books about dieting and diets in general.. not sure which one to recommend. I am currently reading Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes but the book is pretty dry and probably not a good starting point for an 18 year old. Maybe you could search the forums for threads about books and go from there.
Realistically he is going to have to get to a point where enough is enough and he wants to get healthy. It's nice to say 'yeah I want to lose weight' but we all know that such ideals usually fall to the background and are put off indefinitely. When he gets to the 'Im going to do this no matter what' point, he'll need to learn how to do it which is why I was recommending books.
Practical advice.. have healthy quick options readily available. Buy a ton of vegetables and fruits and cut them up ready to eat in the fridge so that he could grab them quickly instead of a bag of chips. Try replacing the normal things he eats with healthier alternatives. Advise him to go for a walk once a day for at least 30 minutes.
Eventually the idea will be to eliminate processed foods, avoid highly caloric and high sugar foods, eat low on the food chain -- fruits, vegetables, healthy proteins. Once he gets into it, tracking calories and progress on a site such as this is a good idea too.
One of the most notable things people often post about losing weight is that it really didn't take that much of a change of habits to get into eating healthy. That's a point I would press with him -- change a few things here and there and food will start working for him instead of against him.
Good luck and congratulations with your own success :) |
| Foods |
Carbs are not the freaking enemy |
Jul 17 2009 21:52 (UTC) |
5 |
I followed a low carb diet for about six months and had good succeess with it. I was very adamant about learning about the diet before starting on it. I read several books, read many forums and tips and stories from those who were currently doing low carb. I found that most people have a complete and total lack of understanding when it comes to low carb. They think all you eat is bacon, a pound of cheese, four steaks, etc.
In reality, the advice for low carb diets is not all that different than many other styles of eating. Eat a lot of vegetables as they are mainly low in carbs (and calories). The reason "low carb" is so strict in the beginning is to help you break the habit of eating processed junk foods. The first phase is only two weeks, then you move on and start a more normal diet, which includes some fruits, still a lot of vegetables, healthy protein choices, etc. In this phase I ended up losing 65 pounds.
Unfortunately after I switched jobs, moved, etc, I went back to unhealthy eating and gained it back. That's my fault, not the diets fault. Not wanting to restrict myself to just one way of eating, I've researched a bunch of others and have found a way of eating that works for me. It's not low carb, its not high carb. However it still focuses primarily on vegetables, some fruits, and healthy protein choices such as eggs, lean meats (organic if possible), nuts, seeds, beans, healthy fats, etc. I use this site to track calorie intake because no matter what style of eating you choose, the number of calories is what it boils down to. There are lots of varieties of eating that will get the number of calories to remain low, but in reality thats the bottom line.
Anyone who is going to follow a low carb diet needs to read and learn how to it properly. Don't listen to the people who mock it or dismiss it out of hand; that's their arrogance and their problem.
Good luck :) |
| The Lounge |
Quick Poll: Has anyone here read The Stand? |
Jul 16 2009 13:31 (UTC) |
4 |
M-O-O-N, that spells 'The Stand'!
I agree -- excellent book. I've read it several times. I am currently just about to finish 'The Dark Tower' series for the 2nd time. The first time I read it, this time I am listening to all the books on audio. Very cool! |
| Weight Loss |
Stopped Exercising and am losing weight? Huh? |
Jul 15 2009 13:21 (UTC) |
|
This is actually pretty typical. When you are working out, your muscles are being used and are building up slowly but surely. They retain water and cause the body to expend energy in repairing them. As soon as you stop working out and those same muscles are no longer being used regularly, they will deflate a bit, no longer need the water retention for repairs, and you'll lose a little bit of weight.
Once you start working out again, your weight would likely jump back up a few pounds initially as the process starts again.
Hope that helps :) |
| Motivation |
How much have you lost so far? |
Jul 15 2009 13:17 (UTC) |
23 |
14 since the beginning of may... 30 lbs lighter than this time last year. :) |
| The Lounge |
eating 7000 calories |
Jul 14 2009 17:04 (UTC) |
44 |
Thousands of calories of junk food isn't too difficult to achieve on a regular basis if you are not watching what you eat or eat a lot of fast food / convenience foods like chips, candy, etc.
I do agree that when sticking to healthy foods, its a bit more difficult to reach higher amounts of calories. Even so, there are calorie dense healthy foods such as nuts, seeds, eggs, dairy that you can eat where its not a lot of food, its still relatively good for you, and can quickly get you to your calorie goal. Macadamia nuts, almonds, etc are good examples.
I still eat a lot of food now that I am watching what I eat. It's the choices that make all the difference. It's not fun to eat a big cucumber instead of a big bag of doritoes, but I feel a lot better and do not miss the lethargic guilt ridden after effects of junk food. :) |
| The Lounge |
My sister steals from me. |
Jul 14 2009 13:30 (UTC) |
3 |
Make a not-so-obvious mark on the item(s) in question rather than putting your name on it. That way when she is caught with the item and insists its hers, you can demonstrate its actually yours.
You should get some gag gifts / toys and leave those around for her. Some conditioner that turns her hair blue or toothpaste that turns her teeth green would be a good lesson.
Realistically locking your stuff up is a good idea. Annoying, but its better than wondering where everything went. |
| The Lounge |
Question for guys or women with difficult husbands.. |
Jul 13 2009 17:11 (UTC) |
121 |
This may sound rude, but it is somewhat relevant. Based on your profile it looks like you have a ways to go before reaching your goal. Now before people bite my head off, I do think it is something to take into consideration when talking about sexual appeal. If you have been married less than a year, than most likely your husband married you as you are now, so its a real low blow for him to suddenly say he doesn't find you sexually attractive. Based on your profile picture, it doesn't look like he is in prime health either which may explain why he needed to go to a prostitute for his 'fix'.
The main reason I bring this up is more about when to do what you need to do and not if. When people are married and are in love, they accept each other for who they are regardless or they shouldn't get married. Any guy that tells his wife she is not attractive and goes to a prostitute is a moron, plain and simple. You do not have a future with something like that. As comedian Chris Rock once said, "A guy is only as faithful as his options." Down the road if your husband finds someone else to fool around with, he's going to do it. That trust has been broken and hoping he is suddenly going to change is really wishful thinking.
Being on here, losing weight and getting healthy is great for you. You should be doing this for yourself. Maybe now isn't the time to rock the boat and you continue doing what you are doing so that when eventually the marriage breaks up you will be in a better position, rather than having health be just one more thing piled on. On the other hand, if you can afford it and kids arent involved (which is hopefully the case since you are only 19), maybe breaking apart right now will help you focus on yourself, chalk this up to a mistake, and move on.
It's really up to you and noone can force you what decision to make. Maybe if you get in shape he will find you more appealing again and your marriage will continue. I still think his actions were a fatal blow.. but that's your decision not ours or mine.
Whatever happens I wish you good luck! Please do not allow this to be an excuse to go back to old habits and lose the progress you've already made. :) |
| Foods |
I CANT BELIEVE I USED TO EAT THAT moment?! |
Jul 13 2009 13:57 (UTC) |
3 |
I am also one of those that needed quantity when eating. We ate out a lot, and I'd always finish whatever I ordered and rarely took anything home.
Places like Chilis were bad: chips with their chili queso, a 'big mouth' burger with fries, and a diet coke.
McDonalds: Double Quarter Pounder supersized with fries and diet coke.
Jack in the Box: Ultimate Cheeseburger, large fries, two tacos, diet coke.
Chipotle: Chicken burrito, two sides of chips, diet coke..
You can see the pattern! At home wasn't much better.. a lot of times my wife and I would make a large pan of breaded chicken nuggets and fries. Or chips with dip and go through a whole bag.
We'd order two large papa johns pizzas and I could eat all but about two slices of a large by myself.
Not to mention buffets.. chinese buffet or whatever, those were never anywhere near healthy.
Reflecting on these things now allows me to calm down and not freak out if it takes a little bit to lose weight. The two score of years of eating terribly does take time to reverse! |
| Weight Loss |
My 'Calorie Deficit' problem |
Jul 12 2009 02:24 (UTC) |
|
Unless you are closing in on your goal, a deficit around 1000 calories per day (2lb a week) isn't too bad, especially since your daily calories burned is high with your exercising.
In regards to the amounts of calories, I'm sure you've heard the expression that 'it takes fat to lose fat'. There are serveral choices that are healthy that are calorie dense that you could have to supplement your daily calories. The main one that comes to mind is nuts and seeds -- they have healthy monounsuturated fats and have lots of calories for the small amount of food. Macadamia nuts is a good one -- if you had a handful of nuts a few times throughout the day, I doubt you would have problems reaching your daily goal for calories.
Organic dairy would be another good option that is healthy and has a fair amount of calories compared to the portion size.
I guess it depends on where you are getting most of your calories from. If you had to eat 10 cucumbers to get 250 calories then that would certainly be a lot! If you needed two handfuls of nuts on the otherhand, thats not too bad. :)
Good luck! |
| The Lounge |
650 Pound Man? |
Jul 12 2009 02:14 (UTC) |
37 |
Original Post by loriklorik:
People with problems aren’t just helpless victims. They aren’t mindless balls of flesh that are clueless to their situation put here for us to pity. All they need is to actually start doing SOMETHING about it (even if that something is just putting down the bucket of chicken). They just need to get over themselves and their problems and start taking responsibility for their own life.
..
One thing I do know though. Articles and people saying how he just “cant control himself” and how its an “addiction” or anything else that shifts the responsibility from himself to an outside issue is just enabling these people to continue as they are. They read how being fat is an illness and when they consider their situation, they feel they just can’t do it because they are “sick” and “can’t on their own”. You’re giving these people all the material they need to convince themselves that fixing their bodies is out of their control and help turn them into the helpless victim that they so aptly play.
You are making a lot of assumptions and its making you appear foolish and callous. Maybe you get off on being mr tough guy on an anonymous message board. If thats the case, then fine.
You're obviously no psychology major. What you are saying is merely your opinion; you have no insight into this particular person's situation, what they have and have not tried, nor do you give credit to despite efforts, people still fail at their goals. You attitude of 'just do it you mental retard' is pretty retarded in itself.
I always thought that 'losing weight' would take a lot of effort. Planning meals, constant trips to the grocery store, expensive vitamins, cooking and preparing foods, exercising regularly, etc were all things that I considered when I knew I had to lose weight. Sometimes things are going on in life where its easier to put something like getting more healthy aside and deal with whatever is going on -- loss of job, divorce, death in the family, financial crisis, medical condition thats preventing exercise.. whatever. In the end they are excuses. Yet at least some people agree they are valid concerns.
Not only that, but as time goes on, the prospect of losing a huge amount of weight becomes more and more daunting. The worse it gets, the easier it is to ignore it and put it off until later.
The cheapest and most ready foods available are the foods that are absolutely the worst for you. You can't know that this person was eating an entire pizza or buckets of chicken or whatever. I am sure his eating habits weren't great, but it is easy to just ignore the nutritional content.
Most, if not all of us here on this board, have reached a point where we did in fact say enough is enough, its time to do this hell or high water. The person in this story reached that point as well and he did something about it. Now his life has greatly improved as a result and should be inspirational to others. I don't think anyone really needs captain obvious peeing on the parade by pointing out how unhealthy the person was before their accomplishment. If anything it simply demonstrates how little you really understand about life and the people who live it.
Of course, at 25 you obviously know everything. Have a good one. :) |
| Weight Loss |
Is eating six meals a day really the answer? |
Jul 11 2009 23:17 (UTC) |
12 |
There are a lot of varying opinions when it comes to what to eat and when to eat it. The most important thing is to find what works for you based on your appetite and satisfaction level, your ability to prepare food and have the time to eat it, social demands in regards to eating, etc.
There's really no one right way, and any way we choose is not magic. It's not like I choose a certain style and have a lot of advantages over someone with a different style. The goal is to find something you do regardless, not considering it a diet, where over time you will get healthy and be able to stick with it.
For me, after trying various ways of eating and after doing a bunch of research, I now stick to a diet where I do not have traditional breakfast or lunch. Instead, I bring with me to work a bunch of vegetables and some fruits. I'll bring green or red peppers, cucumber, tomatoes, carrots, celery, etc. Not all at once, but two or three of those choices a day. I'll also bring some healthy fruits such as plums, grapefruits, oranges, peaches, apples, cherries. I'll also usually grab something fun like a 100 calorie pack of crackers.
I work out over my lunch break and have a lot of energy during the day. I do not get the lethargy of eating a lot of food in the morning or afternoon that usually made me sleepy at work. By the time I get home around 3 or 4 oclock, I've probably had about 500 to 600 calories for the day (which includes 120 calories for my post workout protein shake). For the evening meal, I'll make a nice big salad with lettuce, peppers, tomatos, jalapeno peppers, some cheese, bacon and croutons in limited amounts for taste and some organic vinaigrette salad dressing. That's usually about 600 calories and very filling. An hour or so later I'll have my main protein (eggs, rice, organic meats if possible, nuts, seeds, etc) and some cooked vegetables. I'll usually have enough calories left over for a 100 calorie dessert as I relax before bed.
This isn't THE right way to eat, but it works for me. I do not feel hungry or focus or worry about food during the day. My mandatory lunch break doesn't have me pining for food as I use that time to work out. Once the day is done I can enjoy a big salad and a satisfying meal and still be 1000 calories less than what I am estimated to burn. I ditch the processed foods -- the salad and protein with cooked vegetables does not drive my insulin through the roof. :)
There are a lot of people who enjoy snacking throughout the day, and others who naturally just eat one big meal a day and always have. My advice is to listen to everyone about whats worked for them (as long as its healthy) and find whatever it is that works for you.
Good luck :) |