CUT OUT THE WHITE!!!!
Several years ago my doctor gave me an awsome eating plan (and refused to give me weightloss pills) It was quite simple. Cut out everything white. If its white, dont eat it. For example, Milk (lowfat or no fat is ok), egg whites, white breads, pastas, sugars, icecreams, white rice, and sweets. Step 2 was to cut out PORK AND BEEF. I was allowed to eat Fish, Turkey and Chicken. Step 3 I was allowed all the fruits vegetables, and salads I wanted. Step 4 was to add a little exercise into the mix and he said the pounds would FALL off like magic. Well guess what IT WORKED! I lost 20 pounds in 1 month, without starving! I wished i had stuck to it but i gave into my fast food cravings. I will admit im not perfect, but this plan really works!
Has anyone ever tried this plan before? If so did it work for you? Would anyone be interested in forming a group to try it along with the calorie counting? Please post a reply of your thoughts.
congarts on the weight loss tho! :)
I will agree that it's a good rule to avoid white starches,though--like white bread and rice. But what about onions, and mushrooms, and lowfat cottage cheese, and...?
I honestly always believed you can eat what you want and lose weight if you work it into your caloric needs. Yes, some options are overall healthier for you, but what it all ends up to is a calorie is a calorie.
are whole grains allowed?
Besides, I've been stuffing my face with pizza, McDonalds, Burger King, and the like. I'm down, what, 11.5 pounds? In three weeks, I believe? Without adding exercise to the mix because I work too much.
So I'm sorry, I think that plan blows. You may lose weight, and I congratulate you on that, but you're restricting yourself from all that is yummy. And healthy.
Like cottage cheese. With diced tomatoes.
And if my comment seems to have a grumpy e-tone to it, I just woke up and have to start studying in about eight mintues or so.
I'd want to check the nutritional balance of what you were eating.
But it's really just a mnemonic device - and really that's what most fad diets are too.
Low-Carb, often works for some people because it's harder to eat (and/or afford to eat) 5000 Cals of protein than Carbohydrates.
Paleo, in some of it's more feasible forms is just what doctors have been telling you to eat for years.
Negative-Calorie, again it's difficult to eat your caloric requirement in vegetables. For example IIRC if I was to eat my maintenance allowance in Spinach. It would be something like 8Kgs.
As long as you are making sure you're getting a good nutritional balance. I don't see the problem with said devices. It's of course better to recognize them as such. Since chocolate is, in most forms not white and I can't see the all-chocolate diet really doing much for our health. :)
I just wanted to comment about "too radical". Eating lots of fruits and vegetables and no processed foods is radical??? Well I must just be living on the edge of sanity over here.
while this may work in the short term (which has some merit since it seems a reasonably well-balanced eating plan), it doesn't amount to a lifestyle change sufficient to teach a person to make healthy eating decisions and maintain weight loss in the long term.
Isn't that the essence of healthy eating? Not having certain things?
No. The essence of healthy eating is moderation, and good desicion making. (Finding lower fat/ccal alternitaves when possible, limiting how often you eat certain things.) In my view, healthy eating is the preference of fruits and vegetables, but definately not the exclusion of everything else. Exclusion is short term; fad; unstable.
Healthy eating is a life long permanent change, and it is virtually impossible to keep up the 'no white rule' or 'no carb' or any of that other nonsense for the rest of your life.

So you can keep track of what you eat - which enables you to analyze your foods and receive the following:
- Health Score of your overall diet
- Warning when you approach your daily calorie limit
- Overview of the good and bad nutrients
