The box says 3 tbsp unpopped (makes 4 cups popped) for serving size
and it has seperate calorie information for 3 tbsp unpopped and 1 cup popped.
Let's say I ate the whole bag...just for arguement's sake. If I did the math for the 3 tbsp unpopped popcorn, I would have eaten 540 calories. But if I did the math for the popped popcorn, it would equal 420 calories.
If that's true, why does unpopped popcorn have more calories than popped popcorn?
But I just ate some non-100cal popcorn and need some help with that.
perhaps i don't really like popcorn?
...or something?
Original Post by septimusette:
arew we sure it's not because popped popcorn is lighter... more air? And the dense-ness of unpopped makes it have more calories...?
...or something?
Um no. 1 kernel of popcorn should have the same number of calories no matter what form it is in.
I *think* that popped popcorn comes out as fewer calories because when you put it in the microwave, not all the kernels will pop. Some are just duds. Therefore the calorie counts for the kernels include all the kernels, but the calorie counts for the popcorn includes only the ones that have popped.
It's because of the nature of how calories are measured. Basically, the scientists take the food you want to measure and light it on fire, then measure how much energy it produces. Your unpopped popcorn contains more potential energy than your popped popcorn (because some energy is released during the popping) and will have less energy in it when it is burned to measure the caloric content.
The quick summary: popping your popcorn will make it have fewer calories.
| New journal post Time to get serious by iztastic 03:42 |
|
| cajunrider added augustnkate as a friend | |
| mrsvee3170 added mayflower30 as a friend |
