For people who want a killer butt (This is Perfection)

People disagreed/didn't like wich is fine...so...you wanna see the workouts go to my journal.

thanks,

Potter

Original Post by giggle_puppy:

Why i think Bare Knuckle is a joke. Fights are normally very short coz any idiot can throw a one shot ko punch bare knuckle. Fighters are scared a lot of the time to break/sprain so hard throws arent done ALL that often. Then the MMA stuff well eh, im just personally not a fan of that, its boring watching grown men grope each other on the floor. I should do bare knuckle to prove a point, if i can throw a 1 shot KO with 12 ounce gloves i imagine i can do it with out any on pretty easy lmao.

id fight with you giggle_puppy. to prove that you couldnt 1-shot KO anyone and everyone. not trying to insult you or anything, thats not my "text tone" lol (its hard to tell tone or other things in text)

personally, i think fighting is fun and cool. except when one person decides to fight someone who doesnt want to fight. thats not fun....assault isnt fun or cool. but two people consenting to a fight, where your strength and tactics/skills show how youre training has paid off....its a fun challenge.

if you're ever in ottawa GP, look me up. we can both sign injury waiver forms (i dont want to be sued lol)

i hope this doesnt spark another fight. i think i kept my text tone mild.

Original Post by floggingsully:

Original Post by mgosie:

[perfection for HIM, "sharing his results..."...which inspired a few to say, "good idea, ill try that!"]

-How do you know it was perfect for him? If every routine can be improved upon (like you say below) then isn't it true that no routine is perfect?

[semantics. he said it was perfect for him and he was giving his routine for a killer butt...he shared]

 

[...everything can be improved upon in every fitness routine ANYONE does in the entire world...why was it necessary for you to "improve" on something that works for someone else?

- It may work for someone else, but it also might be able to work better if certain things were changed.  I still don't see why you are so agains multiple points of view being shared on a public forum, the original poster said his routine was perfect, I disagreed and explained how I thought it could be made better. 

[i never said i was against anything. i simply didn't like how you 'felt the need' to pick apart a suggested routine of an athletic person and put it in a negative light. i've said that repeatedly now.] 

-I believe that having multiple points of view expressed allows people to make a more well-informed decision.  You apparently think all we should do on these forums is tell everyone how great their routine is, and never even think about disagreeing with what others post.

[that is not "apparently" what i think.  i enjoy sharing ideas, iv'e picked up many here, but as i said already: i find you picking apart his suggestion: unwarrented and negative.]

  are you some type of elite muscle god who can tweak every routine to perfection?  Stand down already, the dude was trying to be creative and encouraging for christsake.]

-No, I'm not a muscle god and I never claimed that I could make anything perfect. Just because the original poster was trying to be creative doesn't mean disagreement was unwarranted.

[...what warrents a disagreement: mis-information or misspeaks (you corrected his 90 degree thing...), injury would be caused, and lies.  i find those valid reasons for a disagreement.  i don't find 'how' you can disagree with someone who had a butt routine that works for him and he decided to share it. hes got a butt to prove it works. but apparently, you find it okay to tell him he'd have a nicer butt if he did it your way. and in my eyes, thats petty and egotistical of you - under these circumstances.]

**ALERT, ALERT** proceed ahead with caution....  

[IGNORANT ANALOGY. And once again you manage to bring the "thought" process down in the whole way of thinking about this.  How you can try to equate a workable routine of a healthy athletic man to "crack cocaine weightloss"?  *sigh*]

-The point was that just because someone says something works for them doesn't mean it is the best way of accomplishing a goal.  I feel that the analogy demonstrated my point.

[your analogy demonstrated one thing: the 'value' you put on mr. potters original post, because you apparently believe that his post was analogous to the advise of "losing weight on crack cocaine", and his post was nothing of the sort.]

[i'll tell you whats unneccsary AND netagive -- your ignorant baseless analogy that lacks any resembelance to the actual circumstances.  i don't suppose you have a law degree, huh?] 

-It lacked resemblance to the actual circumstances? Someone suggested something that works for them and other people assuming that it working for one person makes it the best possible route to an end and therefor making it immune to criticism obvisously has no resemblance to what's been going on.

[repeated for emphasis: your analogy demonstrated one thing: the 'value' you put on mr. potters original post, because you apparently believe that his post was analogous to the advise of "losing weight on crack cocaine", and his post HAD value, thats why he shared it.... also,

[analogous would have been:  happysusan posts a thread about how she obtained killer abs, and posts her routine so you can try it too if you want:  flogginsully comes by and says "abs are cooked in the kitchen, take your recepie somewhere else! it only works if you are a genetic freak. you must be a genetic freak!"]

-I don't have a law degree (though I did get an A- in critical reasoning), I do have a science degree.

[i was hoping you didn't have a law degree... :)]

[P.S. i'm very proud to say that i did not call your analogy STUPID, as i really, really wanted too....x1000] 

-You calling my analogy stupid would probably have been a more valid criticism than calling it either ignorant or baseless.

[...naw, it was ignorant, because you lack the ability to understand why it was so stupid in the first place.  also baseless considering the value measurement you gave it.]

Also sorry for the sarcastic law comment, but common. 

-What's common? sarcastic law comments? I don't get it.

[...yes, i see clearly that you are not getting it...]

someone owes me $.75 $5.00 for my time now...

 

 

mgosie and floggingsully, you guys make following the trail of bitching more difficult when you  reply like that. I can't tell who the person is who can't spell  

Original Post by floggingsully:

Original Post by mgosie:

flogginskully:  i think i have a workable solution for to improve on your analogy skills.  while i'm sure they work for you, they might cause brain injury to those trying to understand them.  in the future i suggest you squat more and think less.

  ;)

 I don't see how squating more would improve my analogy skills.  Maybe you could provide the reasoning behind your suggestions the way I backed up my suggestions earlier in this thread.

Also, if my analogy skills work for me than who are you to negativly nit-pick and bash my skills or analogies.  My analogies work for me so obviously they're perfect and shouldln't be ciriticized and no opposing views or disagreement is necessary or warranted.

 ...sarcasm of my sarcasm of your lack of analogy skills, is still not analogous to the real issue at hand.  :) 

Original Post by amethystgirl:

And I'm sorry for ruining the fun, but I was actually getting worried that both Potter and FloggingSully would stop posting what they know about fitness, and I've seen posts from BOTH of them that were really valuable for me.

theres that value word again.  btw: i couldn't agree more!

Original Post by spirochete:

mgosie and floggingsully, you guys make following the trail of bitching more difficult when you reply like that. I can't tell who the person is who can't spell

i have a spelling genetic defect and its directly related to my being able to grow three inches in my legs after a set of squats.   :)

Original Post by trhawley:

Leave it to Spirochete to bitch about how others bitch!

 ahahaha!