| Forum | Topic | Date | Replies |
| Health & Support | Will eating a higher fat content kick start my period? | Nov 06 2011 12:57 (UTC) |
3 |
|
^The truth is we're horribly complex beings. There is no hard and fast solution to every problem. You may need to go and see and endocrinologist to check out if everything's okay. |
|||
| Health & Support | Will eating a higher fat content kick start my period? | Nov 05 2011 17:07 (UTC) |
6 |
|
Most definitely. Fats are very much a necessary part of being healthy. I would advise you to up your intake from many possible sources: oily fish, good quality cheeses and butters/spreads, meat with a reasonable fat content, more peanut butter and use a few tbsps of oil in your cooking. I personally have started taking multivitamins (fortified with iron) every day to supplement my intake and also a capsule of cod liver oil (also daily). Already I feel like my hair and nails are strengthened and are extra lush. I would try to let your body get its periods back by itself i.e. no hormonal pills. I actually think they are the work of Satan anyway. Just don't panic about it you just need to let your body trust you. |
|||
| Health & Support | Worried about weight gain | Nov 04 2011 12:44 (UTC) |
10 |
|
I concur with the others. You look your prime pre-ED. You have a great natural shape with a very defined waist and a decent pair to boot! A lot of women would actually kill to have that, you're very lucky :) |
|||
| The Lounge | Exes....The Good, The Bad, The Crazy... | Oct 26 2011 17:17 (UTC) |
28 |
|
|||
| Health & Support | Relationship Breakup & Loss of Appetite | Oct 19 2011 11:59 (UTC) |
1 |
|
I have been in this exact same situation 3 years ago. My ex completely unexpectedly pulled the plug on our relationship. He had no idea how I felt about him and my world came crashing down when he told me, or rather, emailed me with the breakup. ****. I suddenly couldn't physically eat a morsel. At the time I wanted to lose weight anyway and this was bad timing indeed, because I took advantage of the fact that I couldn't eat and nearly developed a full blown ED. This was horrible and everybody in school talked about how much weight I had lost and I felt like I was going crazy. In addition I had no one to talk to about it and felt so isolated, scared and angry. Please don't end up in the same situation I did. Your body is your best friend, not your enemy. I know that everything you put in your mouth now will feel like cotton wool but that will eventually stop because when you keep your food levels up you keep your metabolism and morale up too. You don't need him! I realise that you wrote this a couple of months ago, please keep us updated! As for time to get over it, you may already be over the most of it by now, but for me I took the best part of a YEAR because of my horrid situation. All the best and good luck. |
|||
| The Lounge | Scientific Proof of God | Oct 15 2011 18:53 (UTC) |
99 |
Abiogenesis may be associated with the Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle in Quantum Physics, explaining that we can either know the position or the momentum of electrons, not both. This is in concordance with the work of the Theoretical Physicist Hideki Yukawa who showed that the meson subatomic particle had a particular type of behaviour where it could create pions (proton and neutron exchange) or a neutron and an antineutron can annihilate each other to create a meson which then decays into a proton/antiproton pair. So yes, something can definitely arise from nothing as paradoxical as that seems. Actually evolution was taking place when primitive molecules of DNA were in a primordial 'soup' - it didn't need the first ameboid cells around to be subject to selection pressures. As a matter of fact, many scientists have tried to mimic evolution by setting up an artificial environment with the very early conditions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93U rey_experiment This is a famous experiment done in the 1950's. What they found was the formation of organic molecules after certain environmental triggers.
|
|||
| The Lounge | Flirting??? When is it no longer harmless? | Oct 13 2011 18:01 (UTC) |
95 |
|
I just had a very recent experience, remarkably similar, albeit on a much smaller scale. I am in a monogamous relationship with my wonderful guy for nearly 2 years now. About a couple of weeks ago I was out with my girlies when we got talking to a male-dominant friendship group. At first when I saw this particular guy I will name George, I actually was NOT attracted to him at all and begged my friend not to talk to him because he actually looked creepy (lol! he does have pretty odd hair and he is too much on the skinny side). But we went over to talk anyway, heavily under the influence and just started chatting. After a small while it was clear that George fancied the pants off me, and he invited me out to smoke a blunt (all his weed), so I went along with it. I also found out a whole load of other unexpected things about him, e.g. his current degree, his interests and hobbies etc. Before long, I started feeling some chemistry between us! In the meanwhile, my friend was getting along REALLY well with his mate. Then I mentioned that I had a boyfriend too him. In a weird way I felt guilty and didn't know why. He asked me for my number which I was reluctant to give...because I knew this may not have been good news. He said he didn't want to push boundaries but I was cool to hang out with, so I gave in and entered my number into his phone. We all said goodbye at the end of the night and at that point it was so obvious that this guy was hot for me. I didn't hear anything from him the next day, but the day after I got a text telling me he was pleased to have met me and wanted to hang out again soon. We were texting each other for the next few days (nothing sexual/emotional mind, just general stuff) and they were really long as well, much longer than my boyfriend's. My boyfriend is very much a man of few words, and with the chemistry there I found I enjoyed talking to him. But I didn't tell my boyfriend I was, which was wrong of me but he knew about George all the same. A few days later I knew he was in town and he invited me to a party, but didn't want to go because of other plans. But then my friend with me last time really wanted to see George's friend, and I thought I'd do friend duties and take her there, and George was going to be there too which made me excited. Wrong I know, guilt and excitement at the same time. I got there and it was like last time, we clicked so well and it didn't help I was drunk and high as a kite. We just spent hours talking and talking, although his other mates were there and nothing would have happened anyway. Next time we saw each other, I was at another party, but he invited me to another club. Stupidly I went along with it...only until 30 minutes after I arrived I saw George kiss another girl. I had no idea why but it drove up a whole myriad of emotions in me, and I ran out of the club without telling him or his mates. I burst into tears and felt so stupid, running all the way home. I was in a relationship, and this guy kissing another girl made me upset! I didn't hear anything from him until the next day when I got a text from him apologising (of which I am not sure; for me going without him knowing or kissing that girl). I waited quite a while and text him back saying 'I need some time away to think, hope you understand'. I got one text back from it and that has been an entire week. So basically what I learnt, which I think is analogous to your situation is that after a while with being with the same person it's only NATURAL that you're curious about other people. Especially where you mention that your husband has not being paying you the attention you want and with regards to communication issues. There is no such thing as "The One" and you will get on with LOTS of people, so will your husband. I think it's right you recognised (eventually) that where this is leading is no bueno. I hate to say it, but I reckon if you pull away from that guy, the texts will stop (likewise with me) and you'll realise all he's after is the physical aspect which he will happily take from you. The other posters here are right too, he would probably only stick around to get what he wants out of you and then piss off. At the end of the day, your husband is there for you. If you are unhappy I think you should reiterate to him that his lack of attention or whatever is getting you down big time. If he doesn't care or put in some effort...then you may have to reevaluate your marriage altogether, which I really hope it doesn't come to. On a more positive note, why don't you go and relieve some of that sexual tension with the hubby right now? ;) |
|||
| Health & Support | What would you tell your eating disorder? | Jun 01 2011 09:46 (UTC) |
12 |
|
Who the hell are you to think you have the right to come and posses my mind and body? You're a toxic little ****. You turned into a **** before I left school. You took me when I was down, vulnerable, like a poor girl who wasn't strong enough to see that you're exactly like an abusive boyfriend. I don't know why you remained in my life for so long. In fact, sometimes it felt like you and I were bonded together in one body. You're NOT special, you wasted me away and dragged out unnecessary pain when I could have dealt with my problems myself. Of course, I was too mentally weak at the time to see you are just a complete parasite, a life-vampire and in no way did you give me freedom. I have cast you out from my body, and I wish you had never existed. I saw exactly what you did to my friend and yet you promised me that we'd be different, you promised me that starving wasn't going to be bad and if it was I had deserved it. Well, f*&k you! You don't look so powerful now do you? Every day you try and tempt me to fall back into our old ways, to rekindle the old flame. Well guess what Honey, that's not gonna happen! Just crawl back into your black little abyss you miserable b*^&@$d! You're a disgusting little monster. |
|||
| Health & Support | Mother out of control!! Help!! | May 30 2011 09:50 (UTC) |
4 |
|
Wow. Just wow. Your mum sounds like a real cow. Sorry. That's not helping, but basically your mother is bad news for you. Do you get on with your dad? Is there any way you could contact him and just explain that living with your mother is heavily impacting your relationship negatively and would he be able to lend you a room for a while? What I've just written sounds like a bleedin' formal letter and your father SHOULD give you somewhere to stay if you are a minor and your home situation is not safe for your emotional/mental health. Your mother sounds like a bully and to be completely honest I'm totally baffled as to why she wanted to be a mother in the first place, someone whom is supposed to show complete love and compassion for their child even throughout the worst of times. That being said, differences aside, the anorexia probably hasn't been brilliant on your mother either. Maybe her being nasty (although nothing excuses it) is some sort of weird coping mechanism, because now that you're ill maybe deep down she knows how much it would kill her to lose you, so instead of becoming efficient at problem solving with the situation she gets angry hoping it will all go away. Your mother should not be calling you horrible things like that, almost as bad as physically hitting you IMO. In all honesty, I believe the best thing for you to do now is to talk to someone you trust, like a nice teacher or something. They'll understand and are there for your pastoral care as well as academic progression. How exactly has your mother turned the rest of your family against you? Did she lie about something you did and/or said? Maybe you could get the person you confide in to make a phone call and explain the situation calmly? If you do and they still don't want to know then you're obviously better off not having them in your life anyway. The best thing for you to do now is to talk to an elder that you trust. Sitting around and keeping it to yourself is just making it worse. Don't show your mother that her bullying behaviour can win, because it's not cool and definitely a form of child abuse. |
|||
| The Lounge | agnostics/atheists: raising children w/o religion | May 17 2011 12:32 (UTC) |
68 |
That is EXACTLY the way how religions spread themselves, if there was no idea about heaven or hell there would be no fear and no fear means no one would actually believe it at all. It was simply designed to keep general population under control, meek and 'good' all their lives and 'they get their rewards when they die' - that's exactly the way it represses everyone because as far as we know - we haven't been able to PROVE an afterlife, good enough reason for many people to therefore reject the idea of a god/religion. IMO, religion is a lot like a penis: you don't take it out and wave it round in public and definitely don't shove it down kids throats lol!! I think it is a good idea that you're keeping her options open, things can change unexpectedly. Only 3 years ago I was planning to get myself confirmed but since then my scientific education has opened my eyes to the possibilities out there (namely evolution). I think what your daughter is attracted to is the prospect that at that age it's all very cutesy stuff like baby-in-manger plays and "we love baby Jesus" brigades. Unfortunately, you have to accept that in this world religion is an absolute meme and locations give rise to what religion dominates where. If you are in a Caucasian based area then the chances are is that you cannot get away from people talking about Christianity. In fact, it's just for anything really - once you bring a child into this world one MUST accept the fact that you cannot wrap your children up in cotton wool because you cannot protect them from anything, sooner or later they will get a hold of information and you need to properly equip them with a good mentality on what to accept/reject. Religion isn't a bad thing, I personally just find it a huge delusion. If you're educating your daughter, why not open her up gently to the scientific beliefs? Science can be pulled apart, we can break it down, we can see where the information came from and if it's reliable or not. Religion represents control, circulating arguments and no proof whatsoever. You're better off giving her an honest perspective. |
|||
| The Lounge | agnostics/atheists: raising children w/o religion | May 17 2011 10:51 (UTC) |
74 |
|
I was raised in a Catholic family (but my dad is atheist). I used to fully believe in God because at that point I didn't have that level of critical thinking, however following a scientific education that basically spells out to everyone that Evolution is fact and all the other scientific data we have...kind of disproves the whole Bible really. Probably some time last year I rejected Catholicism altogether and I'm happier for it. IMO you should let your daughter believe what she wants to. Actually, if you're getting frustrated and angry about it it's like you expected her to follow your way of thinking. However, you have brought this on yourself by not telling upfront about what you think and why she should think so too. You have to remember your daughter is just 6 years old, she probably isn't going to have a very well developed concept of the scientific side of things of how and why we all are here. Young children are impressionable and they WILL pick up habits and beliefs horizontally, however, maybe as she gets older she will take a reevaluation on the situation and she may come round to your way of thinking. I don't resent my mother for bringing me up the way she did because she thought she was doing the best thing, and I think that religion can make a person learn compassion and morals. HOWEVER, most atheists are lovely people and as a matter of fact more people die from religious causes with wars and terrorism etc. I mean, I don't disrespect anyone's beliefs but quite frankly I find it very hard to take seriously - none of it actually makes any sense and it was designed by people to control people. I believe it's all outdated and the idea of a heaven and hell is just to scare people into behaving in such a way that it would benefit the leaders' situations. There is no evidence for anything, blind faith is all you have and that's not good enough IMO. Personally I think anyone who believes in heaven is just scared of death and having no afterlife. Well, no, that's all brain activity and psychology - we lose those once we die and that's that. Imagine what it's like before you were born...well that's probably what death will feel like. Final point is, if this annoys you then you might as well tell your daughter what you think and why, if you honestly believe it's all delusional then tell her. Like I said before, because you're her parents the chances are she will come round to your way of thinking, on the other hand I've rejected Catholicism after following most of my life. |
|||
| The Lounge | Single sex schools | May 12 2011 20:09 (UTC) |
5 |
Admittedly no. The reason why my friend grew sick was because she was starting to take her anger out on me when she actually wanted to direct it at her parents. They lived in another country and she joined at the same time as me. We were like sisters for a while and then things went...that definitely constituted the bad times when I was in boarding...but anyway, the other girls were pretty self-absorbed and didn't care too much about their parents anyway. It's hard to explain, but in a situation like that it's like the other students become like family and even the tutors act like guardians. We make our secondary family, if you will. As much as I slated and hated the bad parts, ultimately being in boarding school was good for me. When I was sixteen it was actually my choice to go back into boarding. My mother was actually planning on moving abroad and I was offered to do IB in France but I didn't want to leave the UK, but then things fell apart between her and her fiance and she stayed anyhow, by then I was already there for a year and settled in the lifestyle. The last thing you said definitely is true. My aunt and uncle shoved my cousins into boarding school for their whole lives because they are actually quite selfish (according to my mother) and I've had a couple of 1st hand experiences with them also so I can see how they definitely didn't want their kids around them. Never should have had them then. |
|||
| The Lounge | Single sex schools | May 12 2011 14:00 (UTC) |
19 |
Not true at all. In fact I went into in like a little lamb and came out fighting and kicking. I didn't get homesick at uni, it taught me great things about perseverance and aiming high in life. Most of the people I went to boarding school with turned out just fine even though some of us had a rough ride. I only knew one guy who was already screwed up, he was in the same school and he actually ended up coming to the same uni as me also doing a good degree. Only thing now is that he's turned into a coke dealer. Like me, (NOT the coke dealing!), it probably wasn't the school itself but other things going on and the general lifestyle we had. But hey, we all lived and who doesn't come outta life scarred? We cannot wrap future generations up in miles of bubble wrap. |
|||
| The Lounge | Single sex schools | May 12 2011 13:17 (UTC) |
23 |
Dansmum99: I can completely sympathise with where you are coming from. I can honestly tell you that boarding in the 21st century that things haven't changed much from what you described (probably because most are hell-bent on keeping traditions). I too, developed an eating disorder (pre, or maybe it even WAS anorexia nervosa - I was never properly diagnosed). I cannot say it was the boarding school ITSELF, but the pressure and focus on high achievements certainly played its part, I had a lot of other personal and family issues going on at the same time as well as my first true real heartache. I think that was the real trigger and perfectionist school DID not help, also my ex-roomate ALSO dealt with the same thing at the exact same time as me. Everything was so synergistic in a bad way. I know you may get angry when I say this, but eating disorders aside didn't you find that boarding school toughened you up? I know we didn't appreciate it at the time but I can now smell bad-news bitches from miles away and I can TAKE PEOPLE ON if necessary! It has definitely helped get me into a top uni studying a good degree :) cajunrider: I think what you are saying is pretty unfair. Never for ONE minute did my mother ever ignore me (father totally different story don't wish to go into it) when I was in boarding. She visited me a few times every week and even took me out for a nice few hours for quality time. She called me almost every day and there was always a line of contact going. Also, a lot of foreign students board because their parents live on the other side of the world and get to see them maybe only a few times a year. The Chinese girls all stuck together and made it work because we were all in the same situation. Not to mention, at 16 years of age there are definite tensions that are present between parents and children and to be honest I probably was better off being toughened up in boarding school. Because now I'm not scared of much in life anymore. I am not afraid to be myself, to be by myself and to stand up for what I believe in and chase my passions. |
|||
| The Lounge | Single sex schools | May 12 2011 11:46 (UTC) |
25 |
|
Actually I agree. I lived in a boarding school situation for a number of years. They were both co-ed so males and females, however there was definitely NO mixing allowed of any types in the sleeping areas that could lead to being expelled. Between the ages of 9 - 11 I was originally put in boarding full time, that included weekends. Basically living at school, however, it was a very rubbish school that hardly did anything for our pastoral care and my poor older brother was very, very homesick and I was always expected to go and calm him down. We had to go into boarding school because our mother took up the job of working as an air hostess and did some long haul flights. Now that I actually think about it, I think that was probably a very selfish decision she had made BUT she did make sure that we liked it (I loved it at first but quickly grew to hate it) and she got a house nearby. As time went on, I realised how much I hated everything about it and sure enough, I was picked on day and night. Imagine being bullied, but you can't even go home to escape it. Not only other pupils, but teachers too. That was 2 years of hell. The next time I decided to go back to boarding school it wasn't too much better. I was 16 and finished up my last year of compulsory education and I then decided to move schools after a few years in a state school as a day student to becoming a full time boarder in a private school. I must say, academically I found the jump quite large because the new school had obviously been a lot more strict on its students and anyone dared play up - you were in for it! This time round we were again in a house just for girls and there was a separate one for boys. Now this school was the very typical 'Harry Potter' looking school - it was built in the 19th century and even had its very own ancient chapel in the courtyard. At first, I had some teething problems, at state schools you don't realise how lucky you are when teachers let you get away with murder. Nuh-uh - that one didn't wash with the new school so I felt repressed. Despite having my own room this time, we were still monitored 24/7 - we had 'prep' time every weekday (which was actually a good idea) for a couple of hours after the 7 hour school day we had to be working on homework and assignments (got everything done though!). What I didn't like was the fact that I was surrounded by Jack Wills-wearing hoity-toity perfect students that not only were brilliant academically but sporty also. I was a goth at the time. Other students were unsure of my look and didn't care to involve me in too many things and teachers did not like my sense of individuality - far too threatening!! Narrow minded @$$es. Then when we wanted to leave the campus we ALWAYS had to go and ask permission and sign in and sign out (probably fair enough) but we were INTERROGATED about everything and I felt like I had nothing left to myself anymore. Because we were a boarding school we also had lots of foreign students, some of the Russian guys were very mean about me. (She never should have said anything) but my very tactful Russian friend translated everything they had said about my UK size 12 body calling me a 'tank'. Apparently I was considered one of the larger girls because I didn't conform to their ideal of being a blonde haired, blue eyed model who was not only academically excellent in all fields, but arty AND sporty as well! You cannot imagine the stress and misery I went through with that The only beneficial thing that came out of it was that I was uber prepared for university - I had no trouble at all, in fact it was brilliant because I wasn't being smothered to death by the nosy housemistresses. |
|||
| The Lounge | Humans are superior to other animals because... | May 07 2011 21:09 (UTC) |
65 |
I would really love this message to be passed onto the Authorities that decide to keep some vicious, murderous criminals alive in prison, after all - did they not think about being rational or even having any sense of morals when they themselves harmed or took lives? I think not! If we put down animals for attacking humans and the like for the reasons you staten then so should we for other humans. It is complete double-standards where this is concerned i.e. governments that do not provide the death penalty think that some monsters still have 'rights' where they have totally proved otherwise. Where is the sense in that? I'm not sure if you meant the last thing you said to come across as uncaring, but I for one disagree with what you are saying. Even though they cannot think or reason like us they still have the right to be protected from say, animal testing for cosmetics purely for human benefit...on the other hand, that would also mean removing them from using them as models for medicine, biological research and so many important areas, it's a tricky one! But I think most would agree to draw the line where animal cruelty is concerned with no major help to mankind intended. Here's an even better idea, why don't we get those crazed killers, rapists, paedophiles and use them as subjects for tests we need innocent animals for? After all, vicious, dangerous people like that surely have shown us they have no sense of rights or code of morality, so they can pay it back to society by being a test-subject and if they happen to die, well an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Sorry this has gone off topic a little. |
|||
| The Lounge | Humans are superior to other animals because... | May 07 2011 18:59 (UTC) |
74 |
|
Interesting topic. Many possible responses! Well in my own thoughts, Homo sapiens sapiens (us) are definitely the most dominant species, i.e. our brain sizes and capacity for information and critical analysis is considered outstanding compared to lower vertebrate species. I don't mean to offend anybody when I say this but in reply to the first OP point, there has been no proven existence of any God, so I'm not sure if it's there because religious members believe it to be true or the OP was simply stating it from mass observation from religious dissemination...anyway, in terms of dominance we have advanced considerably which has given us 'power' to catch prey, to harvest produce for feeding ourselves (however other species also do this, although not to the same extent), outsmart many pathogenic species that attack us and to find loopholes in anything (even difficult situations) that we can exploit to our benefit. However, we definitely are not the most successful species. We are the only remaining hominid species, so once we die out that will be it. Comparing this to other taxonomic and phylogenetic groups there are millions of other species in the same Classes and Orders when we look at bacteria, insects and fungi - they produce a lot of offspring very quickly so we're pretty weak in that sense!! I don't think we created the subjects per se, they are all simply concepts, observations and predictions. For example, the science and maths behind some astrophysics theorem has always existed, but it has only been taken into account very recently (in terms of thousands of years) and we've only been around 0.2 MYBP! I am answering this a bit willy-nilly in order to OPs points, but we are definitely not the only species to be sociable. It is actually an evolutionary trait dating back before we even came into existence, it is believed to be advantageous to be included into a 'group' because we have higher chances of finding food, mates and protection from threats and therefore survival and reproduction prospective to pass your genes on. An example of eusocial insects are many species of bees that collect pollen to harvest into honey, Pseudomyrmex ant species are often found in association with Acacia trees where they work to keep their tree free from enemies and also display hierarchies between workers, soldiers and queens. Last thing I'll say is that I can definitely see 'devolution' going on in some areas of the Western world. There are so many ignorant people who don't educate themselves about anything, I'm not referring to level of intelligence because that's not fair and everyone has their own limits. But it frustrates me so much when those people know they don't have to try (I blame our very poorly regulated benefits system in the UK) so will then go onto reproduce en masse, where then their children will also learn to not bother with education. Sometimes I feel very misanthropic when I see such horrendous news headlines about what humans are actually capable of doing. I know this sounds harsh and definitely not true for a lot of honest people but there are always just those few who will ruin things for everybody else, like when I was at school there were so many ignorant-parented children who always interrupted class and generally acted like d*uchebags all the time that prevented me from potentially furthering myself. Not that it matters, because as soon as they got free they went out and all had kids continuing this line of 'devolution' whilst I got to do what I wanted (go to uni with like-minded people: serious about following a passion).
|
|||
| The Lounge | If you wait till you can afford kids, you will never have them | May 06 2011 15:24 (UTC) |
42 |
If I could like this a million times I would!! |
|||

