| Forum | Topic | Date | Replies |
| Fitness | work out once a week - enough? | Jan 26 2012 16:43 (UTC) |
2 |
|
"As the nature of our culture has changed, our relationship with physical activity has changed along with it. We previously were physically strong as a function of our continued existence in a simple physical world. We were adapted to this existence well, since we had no other choice. Those whose strength was adequate to the task of staying alive continued doing so. This shaped our basic physiology, and that of all our vertebrate associates on the bushy little tree of life. It remains with us today. The relatively recent innovation known as the Division of Labor is not so remote that our genetic composition has had time to adapt again. Since most of us now have been freed from the necessity of personally obtaining our subsistence, physical activity is regarded as optional. Indeed it is, from the standpoint of immediate necessity, but the reality of millions of years of adaptation to a ruggedly physical existence will not just go away because desks were invented. "Like it or not, we remain the possessors of potentially strong muscle, bone, sinew, and nerve, and these hard-won commodities demand our attention. They were too long in the making to just be ignored, and we do so at our peril. They are the very components of our existence, the quality of which now depends on our conscious, directed effort at giving them the stimulus they need to stay in the condition that is normal to them. Exercise is that stimulus. "Over and above any considerations of performance for sports, exercise is the stimulus that returns our bodies to the conditions for which they were designed. Humans are not physically normal in the absence of hard physical effort. Exercise is not a thing we do to fix a problem - it is a thing we must do anyway, a thing without which there will always be problems. Exercise is the thing we must do to replicate the conditions under which our physiology was — and still is - adapted, the conditions under which we are physically normal. In other words, exercise is substitute cave-man activity, the thing we need to make our bodies, and in fact our minds, normal in the 21st century. And merely normal, for most worthwhile humans, is not good enough." Mark Rippetoe, Starting Strength |
|||
| Fitness | Resistance training for a Marathon | Jan 26 2012 16:36 (UTC) |
11 |
|
Joe Friel's "Triathlete's Training Bible" has a section on lifting. He goes into some detail about periodization, exercise and weight selection, but he doesn't touch on when to schedule the weight sessions around the endurance stuff. So I found this link which mentions that running and weights can be combined, if the weights are limited to upper body training. Which makes sense to me; my legs really don't like doing leg presses and squats when I'm running 4-5 days/week. But press, bench press, deadlift, row, upright row, and pullups are okay, and if my arms are tired in the swim, it makes me focus on form that much more. Generally, you'd want to run first and lift second, but logistics may mandate otherwise for you. Doesn't really matter, as long as you're not running yourself into the ground. The good news is that you should be able to do everything you need in under an hour. Here's what I'm doing as part of my triathlon training (all sets of 5 reps):
So I'm doing 3 exercises per session, maybe 15 minutes per exercise (includes 3-5 warmup sets), and I'm done in under an hour. This is based on Starting Strength, and is heavier on the upper body (since I'm not squatting). Rippetoe would question my addition of a second pull (the row/pullup line), and to be honest, I don't know what that's going to be like long-term. But my gut is saying that I need to be able to not just pull a bar off the floor (deadlift), but also lift it to my chest (row) or neck (upright row). We'll see how this year goes. |
|||
| Fitness | Agoraphobia vs running | Jan 26 2012 15:03 (UTC) |
2 |
|
Well, 5BX was designed for the Royal Canadian Air Force to help keep their pilots in shape when they were stationed out in the middle of BFE without access to a gym, and who wants to go running outside in Canada? There's polar bears and yetis all over the damn place. I know, I was at Niagara Falls a few weeks back and saw a couple. True story. Anyway, yeah, actual running is far more of a workout than running in place, but if running in place is all you can do, it's better than nothing. |
|||
| Fitness | Toning and Tightening exceeded? | Jan 25 2012 20:40 (UTC) |
1 |
|
What you're doing is a good start, but it's not going to get you very far. My usual recommendation is Starting Strength, but I also like New Rules of Lifting for Women (or the plain NROL). Either will give good programming advice and show you the basics. |
|||
| Fitness | I hate weight training | Jan 24 2012 19:14 (UTC) |
33 |
|
Nthing the recommendation to follow a program. Any of the New Rules of Lifting series has several programs to follow, (I think) 6-12 weeks in length. You'll definitely feel your strength progressing, and even if you're bored while lifting, in the back of your mind you'll know you only have to do this for another 5-11 weeks. Then give yourself a few months without lifting, rinse, repeat. |
|||
| Fitness | Recommendations for Cross-trainers | Jan 24 2012 19:10 (UTC) |
9 |
|
I have a pair of New Balance 620s. I used them primarily for racquetball, and my ankles always felt protected. |
|||
| Fitness | High heart rate | Jan 24 2012 16:41 (UTC) |
10 |
|
I wouldn't worry about it overmuch. If your HRM asks for your weight, it probably is pretty accurate, regardless of your resting heart rate (RHR). If you gain cardiovascular fitness, your RHR will drop, but if your weight is unchanged, you'd still need to get your HR up to 175-180 to get the same workout. What changes is the percent of your heart rate reserve. For example, your RHR is 85, and I'll assume that your HRmlss (the fastest your heart can go without excessive fatigue building up in your limbs) is 195, so your reserve is 195 - 85 = 110. Then let's say you wanted to train at 80% of your heart rate reserve, so 110 * 0.80 = 88, add your RHR, and voila, you should be training at a heart rate of 173. Which is where you're training anyway. Bottom line, it's a tool. It's easy to get deep into the numbers while losing sight of the fact that it's only there to help guide your training. Yes, you burn a higher percentage of fat if you limit your heart rate to 65%, but at 85% you burn about the same total amount of fat AND you get better cardiovascular conditioning. So exercise as hard as you can, and ignore the machine's beeping at you to slow down (unless you're specifically limiting your performance for recovery or what have you). |
|||
| Fitness | I'm so sore | Jan 23 2012 21:24 (UTC) |
2 |
|
Ibuprofen, ice bath (or just cold water), extra sleep tonight. |
|||
| Fitness | Need - 3 day Workout Program | Jan 23 2012 21:16 (UTC) |
12 |
|
The OP already does cardio ("basketball on Mondays"). |
|||
| Fitness | Trying to get toned WHILE getting big | Jan 23 2012 20:56 (UTC) |
5 |
|
|||
| Fitness | Triathlon Training | Jan 23 2012 16:19 (UTC) |
1 |
|
Eat whatever, whenever. You know what works for you and what doesn't. With that in mind, here are my guidelines:
Sample day: swim before work, eggs & cheese grits & apple at 9:00, optional snack around 11:30 (peanut butter & raisins), ride 12:00-1:00, 16 oz chocolate milk at 1:10, chicken & avocado at 2:00, almonds & apricots at 4:00, spaghetti & meatballs & salad at 5:30, peanut butter on toast at 9:30. |
|||
| Fitness | Need - 3 day Workout Program | Jan 23 2012 16:12 (UTC) |
26 |
|
My constant recommendation is Starting Strength. I know you want to lose 30 lb and you're going to be concerned about not losing the fat, but I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at how your body responds to strength training. |
|||
| The Lounge | Overly dramatic mother? | Jan 23 2012 15:21 (UTC) |
1 |
Operant conditioning would suggest that rewarding this behavior makes it likely to recur. I understand parental angst, but the fact remains that assaulting someone for dirtying a coffeepot is a disproportionate reaction. Would it be okay for the daughter to scream at her mother for this scenario? Then why does the mother get a pass? |
|||
| Fitness | Scary Waters, not talking about Jaws | Jan 20 2012 19:39 (UTC) |
2 |
|
For me, the biggest help in sticking to exercise is training for a specific event. Right now, I have a few races on the calendar; some 5Ks and 5 milers, an Olympic-distance triathlon in June and another in September, and an Ironman tentatively scheduled for September 2013. I know that one individual session right now isn't going to make any difference one way or the other, so I'm totally fine with skipping anything. But I also know that my race day experience will completely depend on the aggregate training volume, so there's something driving me to get back on the road before too much time is up. |
|||
| Fitness | Push through the pain? | Jan 19 2012 19:23 (UTC) |
2 |
I've been a product design engineer for about 15 years. I've designed wire that needed to hold insulation integrity for 15 minutes while being exposed to a 2000°F flame and severe vibration, with a nichrome strip wrapped around the wire under tension (to simulate an engine on fire in an aircraft in flight). I've designed a hydraulic component that sees some use in xenon thrusters (satellite station-keeping, usually). My MSME focused on thermo/fluids, and I spent a lot of time analyzing various compressible fluid situations such as might be found in hypersonic vehicles. So in a sense, I am a rocket scientist. And as such, my professional opinion is that your attitude sucks. And, yeah, advising people to do things that increase their chances of injury without offering a corresponding benefit is pretty much wrong. |
|||
| Fitness | Looking for a good running book | Jan 19 2012 19:10 (UTC) |
1 |
|
There's a lot of great information at coolrunning and halhigdon. Ultimately, though, the best thing you can do is just get out there and run. Get a copy of couch to 5K and start following it. |
|||
| Fitness | Taking a week off in Couch to 5k | Jan 19 2012 18:11 (UTC) |
1 |
|
Not a problem. You don't gain fitness overnight, you won't lose it in a week. Mentally, it might be good for you to go out once or twice during the week for 15-20 minutes, just so it's not such a shock to get back into once you're back in the real world. Worst case, you repeat week 7. |
|||
| Fitness | 20 inch thighs :/ | Jan 17 2012 19:11 (UTC) |
22 |
|
My calves are 20". |
|||
| Fitness | How to Progress | Jan 17 2012 16:30 (UTC) |
5 |
Disagree. Move the weights faster; it will increase the amount of force being generated. Better yet, microload or switch to a barbell. |
|||
| Fitness | Plantar Faciitis | Jan 16 2012 16:58 (UTC) |
4 |
|
I had a really nasty bout with plantar fasciitis a few years back. I had to stay off my feet almost completely: no biking, elliptical, or even walking (and I would limit how much I walked around at work). It took ibuprofen 3x/day, taping my foot, stretching and massaging my feet before getting out of bed in the morning, and some physical therapy (roll foot over a soup can, towel pick-ups with my toes, etc.) to clear it up. It was humbling. |
|||

