KnowanHow to get in shape

Posts by knowan


User's Posts | User's Topics


Forum Topic Date Replies
The Lounge diet pills Jul 22 2014
11:05 (UTC)
4

I'm afraid that there is no such thing as a magic pill to help you lose weight.  Those that do work a little have horrible side effects.  Up to and including death.

 

The Lounge you can use them for all sorts of stuff Jul 22 2014
10:56 (UTC)
47

Are you going to add another column to record how long it takes you to smoke those ounces?

The Lounge Struggling with belief in any higher deity(ies) Jul 17 2014
18:08 (UTC)
92

I've worked in a hospital for too long to believe in heaven.  When someone with late-stage dementia dies, and their soul goes to heaven, is it the person that she was when she died that moves on?  Because that person is different than the caring mother, the sassy teenageer, the newlywed that she also was.  You may remember your grandmother as a caring and lovely silver-haired woman who had trouble walking due to the arthritis, but her cousin remembers the daring and devil-may-care girl who snuck out with her to drink beers and kiss boys in the middle of the night.

Peoples personalities change all through their lives.  When you meet your friends and family in heaven, which "them" are you meeting?  Will your grandparents be old like you remember them, or young like their parents remember them?

Will a child who died at 6 months be there?  Will this child forever be an infant, never progressing beyond 6 months old?

If your soul, your personality, stays as it was at your time of death, then no thank you.  I've seen too many people in too many horrible states just before they died.

Personally if the choice was nothing or late-stage dementia, then  I'd rather be nothing for all of eternity.

The Lounge "I don't know how it's different. But it is." Jul 17 2014
14:32 (UTC)
48

Okay, what would you rather have, a lesbian supervising the girls showers, or a gay male supervising the girls showers?

The Lounge What the... what? Jul 10 2014
19:29 (UTC)
3
Original Post by theviewfromhere:

so, that's criminal, right? i mean - literally? i'm pretty sure that here it's illegal to modify the exhaust of a vehicle to make it produce more (and more polluting) emissions.

i mean, lots of people get a pass for driving older polluting vehicles, because forcing somebody who can't afford a decent car to spend thousands to get their piece-of-crap car up to emissions snuff is counter-productive, especially if that piece-of-crap car is what's getting them to work.

but really.

Trucks have different emission standards than cars.  In some states they can be called "farm equipment" and not have to pass any emissions standards at all.  Diesel is exempted in many states as well.  All of the pictures linked to in the article were modified diesel trucks.

The Lounge Where is everybody? Jul 10 2014
19:11 (UTC)
5

PS: Life developing around volcanic vents in the oceans and the first life being chemotrophes is conjecture by the way.  There's no proof for it, since those organisms didn't leave fossils.  But it is widely held belief among scientists.  Still it could be way off.

But photosynthesis developing within the first 500 million years of life developing is a given.  It's been (pretty much) proven.

Oh and most of this I learned back when I got my Biology degree in the ninties.  If someone has access to more recent research then I'll stand corrected.

The Lounge Where is everybody? Jul 10 2014
19:05 (UTC)
6

Nice, but brief.  They missed a few possibilities.

I personally think that the "filter" is behind us.  And the evidence of that can be found here, in our solar system.

Our sun has 3 planets in the "habitable zone", the area where liquid water is freely available.  There's Earth, Mars and Venus.  Of these 3 planets only Earth developed life, or at least only Earth developed life that evolved past single-celled organisms.

Mars is a cold and desolate wasteland, with little atmosphere.  Venus is a vast and burning hell, with surface temperatures above 460 degrees C (or above 850 degrees F for you yanks), and where it rains sulfuric acid through an atmosphere 90 times thicker than Earth's.

Now Mars is a bit of a stretch.  It's smaller than Earth, and probably never developed plate tectonics, or had enough gravity to hold onto it's atmosphere.  This would make it a significantly different starting place than Earth.

But Venus is almost Earth's twin.  It's roughly the same size as Earth and early in the solar system's history it developed almost identical to Earth.  Then something happened and Venus became a barren hellhole, while Earth became a big blue marble.

And that something was life.  Specifically it was the development of photosynthesis.

After Earth was formed, for the first half a billion years or so it was just too damn hot.  But when the planet finally cooled down enough for liquid water to form it took less than 350 million years for life to develop.  No one's exactly sure just how long it took because a) plate tectonics means that the Earth's surface is being constantly melted and replaced, which has a tendency to destroy the evidence. and b) single celled lifeforms don't leave fossils (usually).  They have no hard parts to fossilize.  The very first fossil record we have of life on Earth is Stromatolites, which are basically single-celled organisms that come together and make a mat, and precipitate out calcium.  Basically, they made reefs.  And if you think of all that had to happen, all that had to develop between the very first organism and something that's complex enough to build a reef, you'll know that a very large swath of the earliest development of life on Earth is forever gone from the fossil record.

Stromatolites still exist to this day.  They are rare, but they're still around, 3.6 billion years later.  And one thing that stromatolites do, besides build reef-like structures, is they photosynthesize.

So from this we can deduce that photosynthesis evolved fairly quickly, certainly by 3.5 billion years ago, which is probably less than 500 million years after life first developed.

And that's important.  Very important.

The first life was probably chemotrophes.  They probably evolved around hot vents in the ocean, and "ate" chemicals that were spewing out of these volcanic hot vents by directly absorbing them.  Organisims like this still exist to this day around hot vents n the ocean.

Eventually some of these first, single cells probably developed the ability to eat other cells instead of dissolved chemicals.  Once cells were being preyed on by other cells, there would be an incentive to move away from the vents to escape the predation.  But that would mean moving away from their food source.  So another food source had to be found, and that food source was the sun.

As any basic biology course can tell you, photosynthesis involves taking CO2 plus water plus sunlight and creating energy plus O2.  The oxygen (O2) is a "waste" product of the equation, and actually would be deadly poison to these first primitive cells.  So evolving the ability to photosynthesize had a dual purpose.  It kept the organisms fed when they were away from the vents, and it kept the predators at bay because the oxygen would poison them (at least until the predators developed a resistance to oxygen).

Well the early earth had plenty of CO2.  CO2 is emitted by volcanos, and there were plenty of those around, way more in the hotter, early Earth than there are today.

So the volcanoes spew out CO2, simple organisms convert it to O2.  The carbon gets turned into reefs and oil and coal and buried.

But over on Venus that never happened.  Life either never evolved in the first place, or else never evolved photosynthesis.  Without anything to convert the CO2 to something else it all built up and built up in Venus's atmosphere and created runaway global warming.  To the point where now the atmosphere is 90 times thicker than Earth's and almost entirely carbon dioxide.

But if you take all the oil and coal and limestone (limestone is ancient reefs turned to stone) and convert it back into CO2, then the Earth's atmosphere would be almost identical to Venus's.  Earth too would be uninhabitable.

But it's not.  Earth is instead this warm blue ball that we all find really nice to live on, and it's all thanks to photosynthesis developing early enough to rid our skies of it carbon dioxide and allow our planet to cool down to the point where the water doesn't just boil away.

And that, I think, is the main "filter". The balance between CO2 emission and CO2 sequestering.  You know, the thing that we're presently in the process of screwing up.

The Lounge What have you done for the environment lately? Jul 10 2014
12:49 (UTC)
13

I drive a hybrid car (Toyota Prius).  I have my own vegetable garden and compost my kitchen waste.  We have curbside recycling that I avail myself of.  The only thing they don't take is glass.  I've taken to washing out the glass bottles and re-using them.  This year I picked chives, chopped them, bottled them and froze them and will likely be giving them away for Christmas, along with some cookies.

Speaking of which, my chives have exploded and threatened to take over the veg garden, so I dug up the excess, put them in containers (which I also store and re-use, natch) and gave the plants away.  They have pretty purple flowers and look great in a flower garden, plus you can eat them. They're good for a herb garden, a vegetable garden or a flower garden.  Just not a window box because the do smell like chives.

I've stocked up my flower garden in perennials, so I'm not buying annuals every year.  It took a bit of planning to get it so that when one plant starts to fade another is just starting to bloom, but my sister in law is a botanist and she gave me some pointers.

My youngest son has gone totally vegetarian, so we rarely eat meat anymore.

The only thing I'm ashamed of is the fact that I'm not biking to work.  I tell myself that it's because my bike needs repairs (which is true) but it would take me all of a couple of hours to fix it up.  The real reason is because it's a 20 Km ride with lots of hills.

Tips: you know those DVR boxes and cable boxes?  When you finish watching TV you turn them off, right?  Did you know that turning them off only turns off the display?  The machine itself stays on and consumes almost as much electricity as if you had left them totally on.  Unplug them when not in use, or use one of those surge protector bars with a power switch.

The Lounge Adult Acne May 15 2014
17:08 (UTC)
8

Yeah, regular makeup can lead to clogged pores, which can lead to pimples.

Now I have to leave this conversation while I still have a shred of my man cred left.

*Wanders away mumbling "I swear, I found that out about makeup during my teenage Goth years"

The Lounge Adult Acne May 14 2014
18:39 (UTC)
21
Original Post by smw:

If you do have to wear makeup and have blemishes, I like the Boscia Willowbark treatment as it seems to help a bit and it seals the area from makeup getting into it.

I don't know if it actually has willow bark in it or not, but at one point willow bark was the main source of salicyic acid.

The Lounge Adult Acne May 14 2014
18:36 (UTC)
23
Original Post by februarystars:

Original Post by knowan:

Most OTC (over the counter) medicines contain salicylic acid.  My acne eats that stuff, laughs at it, and poops out a big red pimple.

Benzoyl Peroxide, on the other hand, works.

I've had prescription stuff as well, but I didn't like the side-effects.

I think this TOTALLY depends on the person, skin type, and type of acne.  Benzoyl peroxide worked miracles for me for 3 years, proactiv specifically.  Now it suddenly, doesn't work anymore, and a switch to salicylic acid is the new miracle worker. 

from my vast, and expensive, trial and errors in facial care, not all products (regardless of active ingredient) are created equal.  CVS brand benzoyl peroxide system sucked, while proactiv worked.  Nutrogena salicylic acid did nothing, while the Clinique system with the (same active ingredient) has changed my skin entirely.  

LP -- can you see if you can get samples anywhere?  the start up kit from Clinique is $35, and has CHANGED MY FACE (for the better).  But then again, it was a gamble.. so I know what you mean about the $$$.  Sometimes Sephora has free samples, or even the clinique counter at the mall?  

 

 

Same here.  Proactiv was the first thing that worked.  But proactiv was expensive, so I switched to a different brand with the same active ingredient (Clean and Clear), and that worked just as well, but at only 1/3 the price.

But it was drying out my skin, so I switched to a third brand with the same active ingredient (Neutrogena).  It doesn't dry out my skin, but it also doesn't work.

Which I suppose makes sense.  It's only 5% Benzoyl Peroxide.  The other 95% would be different between one manufacturer and another, and probably makes a difference.  I know that the Clean and Clear has a significant amount of alcohol in it, and the Neutrogena doesn't seem to.

The Lounge Adult Acne May 14 2014
17:06 (UTC)
32

Most OTC (over the counter) medicines contain salicylic acid.  My acne eats that stuff, laughs at it, and poops out a big red pimple.

Benzoyl Peroxide, on the other hand, works.

I've had prescription stuff as well, but I didn't like the side-effects.

The Lounge What should be my priority in my early 20s? May 13 2014
11:56 (UTC)
10

I sent my early twenties having adventures.  I traveled, I had fun, I met people.  I worked a series of meaningless jobs to get enough money to move on to the next place.  I was even briefly homeless (not like Hata though, he had it rough).

And I don't regret a single moment of it.

Late twenties I had kids and the adventures stopped.  I started saving, I used my education to get a decent job.  I started getting fat.  Thirties I bought a house and started putting down roots.  I invested for retirement.

Now I've just cracked forty.  My adventurous twenties are nothing more than a few stories that I tell my kids.  I have savings enough to last me through retirement (I hope).  

Could I be planning a better retirement if I had started saving earlier? Yes, of course.  But why should I toil my youth away in the hopes that I will be able to enjoy life when I'm older?  For all I know future me could be crippled and housebound.  F@#k that guy, he's no fun.

I plan on bookending my life.  Spending my youth having fun, and my retirement having fun.  The part in the middle is where I have to pay for it all.

The Lounge When your DIY became more... May 12 2014
14:12 (UTC)
40
Original Post by lysistrata:

I generally have a healthy respect for the scope of most DIY jobs.  My husband has repeatedly suggested demoing bathrooms and taking down walls in the optimistic delusion that it would only take us a day or two to finish.  A weekend project basically!  Right.  

 

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!  Hee hee hee hee hee! Bwahh haa haa ha!

Watch those home reno shows.  Even the professional contractors who know what they're doing take 4-8 weeks with a 6 person (or larger) crew.

My bathroom only took me a week, but I wasn't moving anything.  Just replacing a vanity and toilet and putting in new flooring and a tub surround.  Tile takes a minimum of 3 days just to allow for proper drying between mortaring the tile and grouting the gaps, and you can't be walking on it or working on other stuff while it dries.

 

The Lounge When your DIY became more... May 12 2014
14:01 (UTC)
41

I actually had a reno that went a bit better than expected.  My dad bought a 2 apartment house for a song, because the previous tenants had destroyed it.  Every door was kicked in, every wall had holes in it, etc.  The only thing we could save was about half of the flooring.

So we check out the kitchen cabinets and find mould behind the sink.  It had penetrated into the laminate countertop and a lot of the bottom of the cabinets.

The good part was that it hadn't penetrated the floors.  Also, by some weird coincidence it hadn't touched the drywall.  We had nightmares of having to rip out the walls and the floors, replace floor joists, etc, but we managed to get away with just rebuilding part of the cabinets and getting a new countertop.

The Lounge What war would you support? May 07 2014
18:52 (UTC)
5

Syria:  That place is a mess, and our jumping in will only make it messier.  The rebels are fractured and divided, so even if the government topples the various rebel groups will fall upon each other and fight amongst each other to see who gets control.  We should stay the hell away, or we'll get drawn into another Iraq.

Ukraine:  The rebels do seem to be organized, but I think that this one can still be solved through diplomacy instead of bombs.

Nigeria:  Surgical strike team.

Central African Republic: I don't know which side to support.  They're all equally horrible.

South Sudan: This one's easier.  One side has oil fields.  Theoretically we could do a "tread lightly" and provide overwhelming air superiority and surgical strikes, while letting local forces do the bulk of the ground fighting (like in Afghanistan).  Still, we all know how Afghanistan ended (it still hasn't), plus our involvement will serve to draw in Islamic fighters from elsewhere. Also, diplomacy seems to be working, at least a little bit.

The Lounge Um Apr 24 2014
16:03 (UTC)
39
Original Post by immabee:

How about luvs started baby sitting when the child was 5 months old, and now, 5 months later the child is 10 months?

Oh sure, if you want to go with the non-imaginative explanation.  Personally I prefer the weirdly specific time machine theory.  She's living in her own Groundhog Day.  That explains why the baby gets dropped off even on the mother's day off.

The Lounge Um Apr 24 2014
15:54 (UTC)
43
Original Post by amethystgirl:

Original Post by knowan:

Original Post by luvs2eat:

 

I babysit a 10 month old. She's here ALL day and often on weekends. This has been going on for 5 months.

Wait a minute, you've been babysitting a 10 month old for 5 months?  How is that even possible? 

Is this a trick question?

Wouldn't it be a 15 month old by now?

Does Luvs have some kind of weirdly specific time machine?

The Lounge Green coffee pills?? Apr 24 2014
15:53 (UTC)
53

Ordering those pills will cause you to lose 20-40 pounds a month.  I guarantee it.  So long as you order them from within the UK and are talking about British pounds sterling.

The Lounge Um Apr 24 2014
15:47 (UTC)
46
Original Post by luvs2eat:

 

I babysit a 10 month old. She's here ALL day and often on weekends. This has been going on for 5 months.

Wait a minute, you've been babysitting a 10 month old for 5 months?  How is that even possible? 

Advertisement
Advertisement