Posts by popthestack

I made some changes to this today. What I've tested is fixed, but I may be missing something. Can you guys verify?

Thanks,
Ryan

Some of the middle books really drag on, book 10 in particular. You'll seriously be better off reading the wikipedia entry for book 10 than trying to read it. There's absolutely nothing important in the entire volume.

I finished it last week and loved it. Is it a perfect book? No. Perfect books are extremely rare. But it is fantastic in spite of what little flaws there are. I was worried that a huge battle hinted at for so, so long couldn't possibly be as epic as it needed to be, but those worries were completely unfounded.

So while it may not be a perfect book, the ending is, in my opinion, a perfect way to end the series. I couldn't be happier.

I updated the books forum so that you can post topics here without it requiring you give it a book author and ISBN. This is so people can add "What's your favorite ___?" topics easier. Or whatever.

Original Post by knittingarch:

Hi!  Since you answered another question so quickly, was the deletion of the "expected goal date" unintentional as well?  I hope so, as I looked at that every day before I began logging my foods.  Really unhappy that this feature seems to be gone.  I hope it can be re-added.  Cheers!

We're planning on adding a new, updated ticker soon, but in the mean time we'll be adding the old ticker back in.

A Christmas Carol and Pride and Prejudice were the first to come to mind.

Original Post by oldguysrule:

If you are in someone's profile, and you click on their picture, you should go to their gallery! What kind of programmers would think otherwise?

Some changes aren't intentional. Thanks for pointing this one out. The picture on the profile page links to the user's gallery again.

Original Post by petya_slavova:

Hi,

I noticed something with one of my custom food details.

I've created this food a long time ago and since then I haven't edited it.

Today I noticed that its calcium content is changed - currently it is showing 189% of daily needs for only 100 g.... when I was logging it more often, I was logging 400g and it wasn't enough to cover 100 % of the daily needs...

Recently I saw that there was another post with complaints about the custom foods automatic changes - can you please fix that faster .. And will the created custom foods be reverted to the original information that is saved or we all have to edit our changed existing food records?

Thanks in advance :)

Yes, there has been an issue with old foods being updated to the newer custom food system. If you edit your food, change the "daily value %" option to "actual values" the problem will go away and won't come back for that food.

Fixing everyone's foods automatically is difficult because there's no straightforward way to tell which foods you've manually edited and fixed since the problem happened. That said, I am working on it.

Rest assured, it won't happen again and any foods you've corrected on your own will not revert again.

Original Post by bellajinxie:

Hello, My filter coffee has 348mg. of potassium and some calcium in analysis area.

Are those values incorrect?

The second half of The Runelords fantasy series. Recommended for fantasy nerds.